PDA

View Full Version : A Bitter Pill to Swallow


Welcome to the Active Low-Carber Forums

Support for Atkins diet, Protein Power, Neanderthin (Paleo Diet), CAD/CALP, Dr. Bernstein Diabetes Solution and any other healthy low-carb diet or plan, all are welcome in our lowcarb community. Forget starvation and fad diets -- join the healthy eating crowd! You may register by clicking here, it's free!



Demi
Fri, Jan-05-07, 06:41
The Washington Post
Published: 5 January, 2007


FTC Fines Marketers of Popular Weight-Loss Remedies for False Ad Claims

The ads for CortiStress said it could reduce your chances of developing Alzheimer's disease. Xenadrine EFX's "thermogenic technology" was supposed to give your metabolism a lift. And TrimSpa said it contained a plant "used by African bushmen for centuries" that could help you lose weight so you could "become all you ever envied."

Those claims are not credible, the Federal Trade Commission concluded, yesterday announcing it will collect about $25 million from the marketers of those popular weight-control pills to settle allegations that they misled consumers.

None of the products was deemed dangerous to a person's health, and the pills will be allowed to remain on store shelves, FTC officials said. The promoters, however, must change their advertising.

The pharmaceutical company Bayer, which was among the FTC's targets, agreed to pay a $3.2 million civil penalty to settle charges that it violated a previous FTC order that required all health claims for its One-a-Day vitamins be "supported by competent and reliable scientific evidence." In national ads, Bayer claimed its One-a-Day WeightSmart contained epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG), a green-tea extract that can help prevent weight gain in women older than 30 who "can gain 10 pounds a decade, due in part to a slowing metabolism."

Those claims were not "substantiated by competent and reliable scientific evidence," the agency said.

The settlement with Bayer "is a wake-up call to any company that wants to push the envelope," FTC Chairman Deborah Platt Majoras said. "Every claim they make they have to have the science to back it up."

Bayer spokeswoman Tricia McKernan said the company never marketed WeightSmart as a weight-loss product and cited three studies supporting the company's claims that EGCG can "enhance metabolism." She said, however, that the company would comply with the agency's orders.

The settlements yesterday were the latest in the FTC's periodic crackdowns on weight-control claims. Since 1990, it has prosecuted more than 100 cases against marketers of flab-busting products, including the promoters of a "tummy-flattening gel" who agreed to pay $3 million last May.

With more than 70 million Americans trying to lose weight and spending $33 billion a year on weight-control products, the market remains lucrative for legitimate operators and hucksters alike. The more than 25,000 dietary supplements on the market are lightly regulated. Their manufacturers are responsible for ensuring that a supplement is safe before it is sold, but they do not need to register their products or get approval. The Food and Drug Administration can take action against unsafe products after the products reach the market. The FTC regulates dietary supplement advertising.

FTC officials said part of the reason consumers fall for phony weight-loss claims is because they see advertisements in major publications like TV Guide, Men's Fitness and People magazine.

"The FTC is asking the media not to run these ads," Majoras said.

Of the settlements the FTC plans to collect, Robert Chinery Jr. and his company, RTC Research and Development, will pay $8 million to $12.8 million for saying Xenadrine EFX was clinically proven to cause rapid and substantial weight loss. Chinery commissioned several studies, but none showed Xenadrine EFX produced substantial weight loss, the FTC said. In fact, one 10-week study showed subjects taking Xenadrine EFX lost fewer pounds than those taking a placebo, the FTC said.

The FTC expects to recover cash and assets worth at least $12 million from Stephen F. Cheng and his company, Window Rock Enterprises, and Gregory Cynaumon and his company, Infinity Advertising, which promoted CortiSlim and CortiStress.

Alexander Goen and several companies associated with him will pay $1.5 million for the marketing of TrimSpa. In addition to TV commercials showing celebrity endorser Anna Nicole Smith romping on a beach, ads for TrimSpa said an ingredient, hoodia gordonii, aided weight loss and described it as a plant used by African bushmen to suppress hunger on long hunting trips. TrimSpa did not admit liability.

Most of the money the FTC is to collect will go toward consumer redress, with the exception of Bayer's penalty, which goes to the U.S. Treasury.



Xenadrine EFX: $8 Million to $12.8 Million Settlement
The FTC alleges that the marketers of Xenadrine EFX falsely advertised that the endorsers in their advertisements lost weight solely through use of Xenadrine. They also failed to disclose that the subjects of the ads were paid from $1,000 to $20,000 for their testimonials. The marketer's claims of clinically proven rapid and substantial weight loss were also false and unsubstantiated, according to FTC allegations.

One-a-Day WeightSmart: $3.2 Million Settlement
The FTC alleges that Bayer's advertisements made unsubstantiated claims that One-a-Day WeightSmart enhanced metabolism through the ingredient EGCG, a green-tea extract, and helped prevent weight gain in some users older than 30.

TrimSpa: $1.5 Million Settlement
The FTC alleges that TrimSpa ads claiming that the ingredient hoodia gordonii suppressed appetite and caused rapid weight loss were not supported by adequate scientific evidence.

CortiSlim and CortiStress: $12 Million Settlement
The FTC alleges that the marketers of CortiSlim and CortiStress made false claims that their products could bring about rapid and permanent weight loss and prevent serious health conditions, including osteoporosis, obesity, diabetes and cancer.



http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/04/AR2007010400388.html

potatofree
Fri, Jan-05-07, 08:04
I'd be curious to see what their profits look like... I suspect the fines wouldn't even come close to hurting them. They can repackage, reformulate and choose their words more carefully, or slap a couple more disclaimers in the fine print and be good to go.

bkloots
Fri, Jan-05-07, 08:17
Fine with me if the government wants to make a little money off of these promoters, but the government will never be able to stop people from being stupid. EVERYBODY KNOWS that diet pills only work if you follow the "diet and exercise" guidelines furnished in the box. Funny thing--if you JUST followed the diet and exercise guidelines, you'd get the same result.

But does that stop us?? No-o-o-o-o. Voice of experience. :lol:

I'm glad the gov't steps in to prevent truly harmful products from entering the marketplace. But they won't stop the avalanche of diet "miracle" products.

By the way, I think it's pretty weasle-y of Bayer to say that a product called "Weight Smart" isn't being advertised as a weight-loss pill.

potatofree
Fri, Jan-05-07, 08:24
I liked this part:

Of the settlements the FTC plans to collect, Robert Chinery Jr. and his company, RTC Research and Development, will pay $8 million to $12.8 million for saying Xenadrine EFX was clinically proven to cause rapid and substantial weight loss. Chinery commissioned several studies, but none showed Xenadrine EFX produced substantial weight loss, the FTC said. In fact, one 10-week study showed subjects taking Xenadrine EFX lost fewer pounds than those taking a placebo, the FTC said.

Absinthe62
Fri, Jan-05-07, 08:45
I'm just disappointed the awful $160 diet pill Leptoprin wasn't included in these lawsuits. Hate that ad with a passion.

potatofree
Fri, Jan-05-07, 09:43
Me too... it's the cheapest trick in the advertising gamebook, and it's not even carried out with ANY subtlety. Hammering people over the head with a high price so you can try to beat them to the punch when they suspect you're gouging them actually must WORK, though, or they wouldn't sell enough to stay in business. :rolleyes:

KvonM
Fri, Jan-05-07, 10:39
i think most of them get away with that cute little "results not typical" disclaimer, which always makes me wonder what kind of results ARE typical.

kallyn
Fri, Jan-05-07, 10:51
By the way, I think it's pretty weasle-y of Bayer to say that a product called "Weight Smart" isn't being advertised as a weight-loss pill.

Actually, I was surprised that the Weightsmart vitamins were included in this settlement, because AFAIK Bayer has never tried to claim that these vitamins are a weightloss pill. I've seen them around for years, and it says all over the box and packaging that they aren't diet pills.

bkloots
Fri, Jan-05-07, 13:21
Actually, Kallyn, I was just being a smartie. I wouldn't put Weight Smart VITAMINS in the same category as those other products AT ALL. They are NOT a weight loss pill, but a vitamin pill, with an ingredient that does seem to have healthy properties. Too bad they got caught up in a bad group.

I don't own stock in Bayer, but it doesn't seem like a fly-by-night outfit.