PDA

View Full Version : Controlling insulin leads to longer life


Welcome to the Active Low-Carber Forums

Support for Atkins diet, Protein Power, Neanderthin (Paleo Diet), CAD/CALP, Dr. Bernstein Diabetes Solution and any other healthy low-carb diet or plan, all are welcome in our lowcarb community. Forget starvation and fad diets -- join the healthy eating crowd! You may register by clicking here, it's free!



Dodger
Sat, Dec-16-06, 13:48
Linchpin discovered in insulin metabolism

Chemists and biologists find gene which might -- if defect -- contribute to the development of Type II diabetes

Scientists from the new interdisciplinary LIMES (Life & Medical Sciences) Centre at the University of Bonn have identified a new gene which could play an important role in the development of diabetes. Flies in which this hereditary factor is defective are also significantly smaller than other members of their species and live appreciably longer. The gene seems to have such a crucial function that it has hardly changed in just under a billion years: it is found in flies, but in a similar form it is also found in mice and humans. In the current issue of the prestigious journal Nature the Bonn researchers have published two articles on this topic.

Sometimes science resembles a relay race: in 1996 the biochemist Professor Waldemar Kolanus discovered a group of cellular proteins, the cytohesins, and described their function in the immune system. Two of his colleagues at the LIMES Centre in Bonn have now found a totally new and completely unexpected function of these proteins which is very relevant to medicine. 'We wanted to know whether there were also cytohesins in the fruit fly drosophila and what functions they have there,' the evolutionary biologist Professor Michael Hoch reminisces. He and his team were in fact successful. They discovered a protein which is very similar to the cytohesins in mammals. Even more interestingly, fruit flies in which the genetic blueprint for this gene is defective are smaller in size. So the researchers nicknamed cytohesin 'Titch'. 'The effect on the insect's growth showed us that 'Titch' could play a key role in the metabolism of insulin – a completely new role for cytohesins,' Professor Hoch says.

New drugs for diabetes

The maximum size of plants or animals is written into their genes. Yet whether they exploit this potential is influenced by a number of other factors. One of them is insulin. Mammals produce increased amounts of this hormone after eating as a reaction to the increasing blood sugar level. Via a complicated sequence of reactions it ensures that muscles and other organs absorb blood sugar. What is more, however, the cascade of insulin signals also determines size and number of the body cells during growth. Apparently, 'Titch' plays a key role in this shower of signals. 'The fruit fly larvae increase their weight 200-fold in the first three days after hatching,' Michael Hoch explains. 'If their 'Titch gene' has mutated, they grow visibly more slowly.' A series of additional observations support the thesis that 'Titch' is extremely important for the metabolism of insulin in drosophila. If there were a cytohesin with a similar function in mammals, this would, for instance, be of great interest for research into diabetes.

In parallel to Michael Hoch's research, Professor Michael Famulok produced an active substance that inhibits cytohesins, known as SecinH3. 'We fed this inhibitor to mice,' he explains. Unlike fruit flies, the rodents do not have just one cytohesin at their disposal, they have four. Professor Famulok wanted to find out whether they play a similar crucial role in the insulin metabolism of mice as 'Titch' does in the fly and discovered the following: 'Liver cells of the animals treated with SecinH3 reacted to insulin not nearly as strongly as they should.' Medical people know this effect: this insulin resistance is regarded as a warning signal for the onset of Type II diabetes.

Six million people suffer from this type of diabetes in Germany alone. It is triggered by an unhealthy diet and lack of exercise, and the tendency is rising. Michael Famulok now thinks new drugs are on the cards. 'There is a class of switch molecules which are activated by cytohesins. This activation is apparently necessary to pass on the signals. If we manage to stimulate the switch molecules with a suitable active substance, we might possibly be able to thereby reverse the resistance to insulin.' A new method described by Michael Famulok in the Nature paper could help in the search for this kind of drug. With its help his team has already found the inhibitor SecinH3.

A long life thanks to a genetic defect"

The joint ancestor of the fruit fly and the mouse lived at least 900 million years ago. Nevertheless, 'Titch' and the corresponding cytohesin in mice are so similar that SecinH3 is effective with both. 'We have fed the inhibitor to our fly larvae,' Michael Hoch explains. 'They then developed as if their 'Titch gene' were defective.' This hereditary factor also has a completely different effect, which really sets the researchers' imagination going. Flies which have a 'Titch' defect live a lot longer than others of their species. 'An exciting effect,' Michael Hoch thinks. 'We certainly must investigate this further.'

http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2006-12/uob-ldi121506.php

ceberezin
Sat, Dec-16-06, 14:22
Oh brother! Another designer molecule so we can continue to eat jelly doughnuts and nit suffer the consequences. What else will this molecule stimulate or suppress besides the "switch molecules."

I thought the following statement was interesting:Mammals produce increased amounts of this hormone after eating as a reaction to the increasing blood sugar level. Food does not increase blood sugar levels substantially unless if includes carbs.

seyont
Sat, Dec-16-06, 20:18
I wonder if insulin resistance is a protective mechanism. Also, if a person eats in such a way to develop insulin resistance (and, of course, continues to eat in that fashion), what happens when you force his body to react to insulin again? Does he balloon up, does his liver go haywire with the cholesterol process, does his immune system shut down forever, where does all the blood sugar go?

Just wondering. It seems like insulin resistance has to be the indicator and not the disease.

Gostrydr
Sat, Dec-16-06, 20:53
Insulin resistance is a persons wake up call. It is not a protective mechanism. You have elevated triglycerides,ldls,lowered hdl's..all this due to the fact that you r body has a hampered ability to control and process the carbs you are taking in.

I for one have insulin resistance. I took an oral glucose test. It took 78 units of my insulin to bring down the 100 grams of dextrose to an acceptable level. Not only does my body have these sugars hanging around longer ,but elevated insulin levels are also dangerous and a stress on the pancreas.

I found out I had it because I would wake up with swollen feet and hands that always felt like they were burning and undescribable fatigue.

so for someone to have insulin resistance the anwer is no starchy or sticky carbs..they should all come from fibrous veggies.

CindySue48
Sat, Dec-16-06, 22:20
I wonder if insulin resistance is a protective mechanism.I wonder also.

here's my rationale.

When we eat a normal amount of food, and a "normal" amount of carbs, our blood sugar goes up and our cells put out receptors to attract the insulin/glucose. Let's say there's 100g of glucose in our blood....and we need all of it, so our body cells put out insulin receptors to attract some of that 100 grams of sugar.

Now, we eat too much sugar, carbs, whatever, and our blood sugar goes up....let's say there's now 500g of glucose in our blood. Because there's so much glucose, our cells know they don't have to work as hard to get what they need, so they pull back on the insulin receptors, thereby limiting the amount of insulin/glucose that can be used.

If the cells don't pull back on the insulin receptors, then too much glucose will be taken into the cells....and that likely will cause problems with the cells.

As blood sugar levels drop, the insulin receptors will get put back out....but if it rises too high they are pulled back to keep the cells from taking too much glucose in.

This is why the meds that "improve" insulin resistance make no sense to me. When someone takes this drug it's essentially forcing cells to put out more receptors, and thereby risk the cells of being overloaded with glucose.

Make sense? It does to me!!

Our bodies are amazing machines. They have backup systems in many areas. In my thinking, insulin resistance is the body's way of preventing too much glucose from entering the cells.

GeorgeMead
Sun, Dec-17-06, 06:50
The gene seems to have such a crucial function that it has hardly changed in just under a billion years:The gene seems to have such a crucial function that it has hardly changed in just under a billion years: Well, let's see how we can intercourse with it and improve on it...After all it couldn't possibly be that it has some sort of SURVIVAL value, could it?

Gostrydr
Sun, Dec-17-06, 09:27
Drugs don't improve insulin resitance,they improve insulin sensitivity.

Insulin resistance is caused by the cells being continously bombarded with insulin..they essentially shut down not allowing the glucose to come into the cell, so this glucose stays in the system. Your body "handles" this glucose by converting it into triglycerides and storing this as fat,especially around the midsection thus increasing ones risk for diabetes and heart disease.

Now how is this a good thing?

Nancy LC
Sun, Dec-17-06, 09:40
I think they're suggesting that the alternative to insulin resistance is something even worse, not that insulin resistance is good.

Gostrydr
Sun, Dec-17-06, 09:48
http://www.healingdaily.com/detoxification-diet/insulin.htm

A little clarifiacation. It is not a protective mechanism,but a shutdown of a bodily process

ceberezin
Sun, Dec-17-06, 13:16
In my understanding, overproduction of any hormone will cause resistance to that hormone. Insulinn resistance is a reaction to the overproduction of insulin caused by eating a carbohydrate-based diet, not a reaction to glucose.

Gostrydr
Sun, Dec-17-06, 13:39
What? All carbs are converted to glucose in the body..the glucose is a by product of carbs. So the glucose is the problem

the body can produce glucose from fat and protein,but not to the effect of carbs.

http://www.metabolic-syndrome.insulitelabs.com/Root-Cause-of-Insulin-Resistance.php

CindySue48
Sun, Dec-17-06, 13:40
Drugs don't improve insulin resitance,they improve insulin sensitivity.

Insulin resistance is caused by the cells being continously bombarded with insulin..they essentially shut down not allowing the glucose to come into the cell, so this glucose stays in the system. Your body "handles" this glucose by converting it into triglycerides and storing this as fat,especially around the midsection thus increasing ones risk for diabetes and heart disease.

Now how is this a good thing?
It WAS a good thing when we didn't know if we'd have food all year or not!

For today's world, with most people having easy access to foods of all kinds, it's NOT a good thing. But I feel that this is another indication that our bodies have NOT had time to adapt to a modern diet.

Nancy LC
Sun, Dec-17-06, 14:03
In my understanding, overproduction of any hormone will cause resistance to that hormone. Insulinn resistance is a reaction to the overproduction of insulin caused by eating a carbohydrate-based diet, not a reaction to glucose.
Hmmm... I wonder. If that were true, wouldn't people with hyperthyroid disease not even be aware they had it? My body never acquired a tolerance for excess thyroid hormone.

LC FP
Sun, Dec-17-06, 16:45
I think insulin resistance is a protective mechanism. If your cells had to accept all the glucose they're exposed to in a high carb phase of your diet, the glucose would gum up all the proteins and enzymes inside the cell. Better to leave it in the circulation where it can't do as much damage. The liver scavenges the excess glucose and "detoxifies" it by converting it into something safer and more inert, saturated fat (palmitic and stearic acid mostly). This fat can be stored in fat cells to keep it out of the way, and then accessed when insulin levels drop (when carb consumption drops) and fat cells can then release the fat to be burned.

If you never enter a low carb phase, you never access the stored fat, and this "natural" protective mecahnism becomes a permanent physiologic disaster.

Gostrydr
Sun, Dec-17-06, 16:57
All that glucose floating around your body is totally ,totally dangerous. It causes cardiovascular damage,blindness,neuropathy..

Insulin resistance is impaired glucose metabolism. It is an affliction a precursor to diabetes..

this is from Jack Challem who is the authority on Insulin resistance

You are about to be engulfed in one of the largest disease epidemics to ever strike North America. It is not a dangerous new flu or some other supergerm. Rather, it is a disease caused by your body's inability to make the most of the food you eat.


The consequences will age you prematurely, making you feel older than you should. If you have this condition, you will also have a sharply increased risk of practically every age-related disorder, including obesity, hypertension, nervous system disorders, eye disease, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, cancer, and Alzheimer's disease. In addition to physical symptoms, you may feel exhausted, spacey, depressed, irritable, or angry when you shouldn't be.


The key underpinning of Syndrome X is insulin resistance-a diet-caused hormonal logjam that interferes with your body's ability to efficiently burn the food you eat. Syndrome X occurs when insulin resistance is combined with high levels of blood fats (cholesterol and triglyceride), too much body fat, and high blood pressure. Both insulin resistance and Syndrome X increase your risk of heart disease and diabetes-and many other serious, life-threatening diseases-because they impact, directly or indirectly, virtually every disease process.