Difference between treadmill systems

[Mike]

What is difference between treadmills

"folating deck" system, "swing arm/hydra suspension" system
and "woodway" system.

Which one is the best?

[joeu2004]

[Sorry if this is a duplicate posting. I got a network error
when I tried posting previously.]

Mike wrote:
> What is difference between treadmills "folating deck"
> system, "swing arm/hydra suspension" system and
> "woodway" system.

"Swing Arm", "Hydra Suspension" and "Woodway" suspension are
all trademarked terms of each manufacturer's implementation of
a "floating deck", which provides shock absorption.

> Which one is the best?

Shock absorption is a good thing. But I am sure that you can 3
different answers to the question of which implementation is
better ;-).

Since each term is a trademark of the manufacturer, I suggest
that you look at the overall quality of each treadmill, rather
than focus on an implementation of any particular detail. If
you truly have narrowed your selection down to a model of each
of the three manufacturers (Smooth Fitness, Greenmaster and
Woodway) and this is the deciding factor, I suggest that you
try out each of their treadmills to see which shock absorption
appeals to you more. You might also look for Consumer Reports
evaluations, if any, of treadmills by the three manufacturers.

[Mike]

<joeu2004@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1159970765.148200.263100@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com...
> [Sorry if this is a duplicate posting. I got a network error
> when I tried posting previously.]
>
> Mike wrote:
> > What is difference between treadmills "folating deck"
> > system, "swing arm/hydra suspension" system and "woodway"
> > system.
>
> "Swing Arm", "Hydra Suspension" and "Woodway" suspension are
> all trademarked terms of each manufacturer's implementation
> of a "floating deck", which provides shock absorption.

Yes, they are treadmarks but this treadmarks mean system which
treadmill using.

Floating deck classic which is wide used have deck on springs
and this apsorption shock, as I see this system is expencive
for changing deck.

Swing arn with hydra supension is when shock is aporbed via
hydra aposrber and swing arm system, and changing this is less
expencive because deck is no changed only aporbers.

Woodway - they use some third mistic to me system for
aporption.

I looking all this as no professional in equipment bussines
and I asking for help... I don't know which system better
aporb shhock and other benefits or no benefits.

> > Which one is the best?
>
> Shock absorption is a good thing. But I am sure that you can
> 3 different answers to the question of which implementation
> is better ;-).

I looking to hear what users and experts say.

> Since each term is a trademark of the manufacturer, I
> suggest that you look at the overall quality of each
> treadmill, rather than focus on an implementation of any
> particular detail.

I looking on qualiti but this is very importan fact.

If you truly have narrowed
> your selection down to a model of each of the three
> manufacturers (Smooth Fitness, Greenmaster and Woodway) and
> this is the deciding factor, I suggest that you try out each
> of their treadmills to see which shock absorption appeals to
> you more. You might also look for Consumer Reports
> evaluations, if any, of treadmills by the three
> manufacturers.

Thank you on suggestions.

[Steve Frei]

"Mike" <mike@supergym.com> wrote in message
news:eg0g10$dbo$1@ss408.t-com.hr...
>
> <joeu2004@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:1159970765.148-
> 200.263100@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com...
>> [Sorry if this is a duplicate posting. I got a network
>> error when I tried posting previously.]
>>
>> Mike wrote:
>> > What is difference between treadmills "folating deck"
>> > system, "swing arm/hydra suspension" system and "woodway"
>> > system.
>>
>> "Swing Arm", "Hydra Suspension" and "Woodway" suspension
>> are all trademarked terms of each manufacturer's
>> implementation of a "floating deck", which provides shock
>> absorption.
>
>
> Yes, they are treadmarks but this treadmarks mean system
> which treadmill using.
>
> Floating deck classic which is wide used have deck on
> springs and this apsorption shock, as I see this system is
> expencive for changing deck.
>
> Swing arn with hydra supension is when shock is aporbed via
> hydra aposrber and swing arm system, and changing this is
> less expencive because deck is no changed only aporbers.
>
> Woodway - they use some third mistic to me system for
> aporption.
>
>
> I looking all this as no professional in equipment bussines
> and I asking for help... I don't know which system better
> aporb shhock and other benefits or no benefits.
>
>
>
>
>> > Which one is the best?
>>
>> Shock absorption is a good thing. But I am sure that you
>> can 3 different answers to the question of which
>> implementation is better ;-).
>
> I looking to hear what users and experts say.
>
>
>
>> Since each term is a trademark of the manufacturer, I
>> suggest that you look at the overall quality of each
>> treadmill, rather than focus on an implementation of any
>> particular detail.
>
> I looking on qualiti but this is very importan fact.
>
>
> If you truly have narrowed
>> your selection down to a model of each of the three
>> manufacturers (Smooth Fitness, Greenmaster and Woodway) and
>> this is the deciding factor, I suggest that you try out
>> each of their treadmills to see which shock absorption
>> appeals to you more. You might also look for Consumer
>> Reports evaluations, if any, of treadmills by the three
>> manufacturers.
>
> Thank you on suggestions.

You should try each in person to see which you prefer, and
compare warranties as well.

-S- http://www.kbnj.com