View Full Version : Wikipedia articles
Welcome to the Active Low-Carber Forums
Support for Atkins diet, Protein Power, Neanderthin (Paleo Diet), CAD/CALP, Dr. Bernstein Diabetes Solution and any other healthy low-carb diet or plan, all are welcome in our lowcarb community. Forget starvation and fad diets -- join the healthy eating crowd! You may register by clicking here, it's free!
Michael C
Sat, Aug-12-06, 17:15
Hi, I've been spending quite a lot of time over at Wikipedia
in the past few months. It has a number of articles relating
to nutrition:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Megavitamin_thearpy
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Optimum_nutrition
If you want to spread the message then join in and contribute
with facts and fighting misinformation.
Take the time to read about their editorial policiy, though.
Original research is banned, so all statements should (in
theory!) be backed up with references and written from a
neutral point of view.
Warning: Wikipedia is very additive (I confess I waste more
time than I should in the physics related areas).
- Michael C Price
Mr. Natura
Sat, Aug-12-06, 17:15
Michael C Price wrote:
> Hi, I've been spending quite a lot of time over at Wikipedia
> in the past few months. It has a number of articles relating
> to nutrition:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Megavitamin_thearpy
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Optimum_nutrition
>
> If you want to spread the message then join in and
> contribute with facts and fighting misinformation.
>
> Take the time to read about their editorial policiy,
> though. Original research is banned, so all statements
> should (in theory!) be backed up with references and
> written from a neutral point of view.
>
> Warning: Wikipedia is very additive (I confess I waste more
> time than I should in the physics related areas).
>
> - Michael C Price
Thanks, but No Thanks! I have better things to do with my
time.
Remember this, what you wrote yesterday on Wikipedia could be
deleted tomorrow by a total idiot. Wikipedia has operationally
proven that a bunch of chimps banging away on a typewriter can
in fact write something that passes for an encyclopedia. :(
Personally, I have been banned twice from Wikipedia. I could
edit, again today, but why bother? I put all my good stuff on
my own web site.
It is about as anti-alternative medicine a place, as it
possibly could be. It IS also being runned by a pornographer
by the name of JimBo, the Bim Bo. :) Do NOT forget their
rather large collection of bigoted
MDs. One MD, without a life, happens to be an Administrator
there. Their number one objective is to trash all
alternative medicine articles.
Be sure to check out Wikipedia's article on Tampons. It has
more significance to those clowns than anything on alternative
medicine. Need I say more?
Mr. Natura
Sun, Aug-13-06, 17:16
Michael C Price wrote:
> That you've been banned is a good advert for
> Wikipedia. Thanks!
Apparently, I do need to say more for the benefit of mentally
Dull types, like you.
Everything you did in Wikipedia lately, I did more than 2
years ago. I personally changed the face of alternative
medicine articles. And, got banned for my efforts twice.
Please, continue knocking yourself out for a pornographer. So,
that some idiot like you can delete all your efforts tomorrow.
You and your Wikipedia Drogies have my condolences.
>
> - Michael C Price "Mr. Natural-Health"
> <johngohde@naturalhealthperspective.com> wrote in
> message news:1155409824.039779.308520@m79g2000cwm.googl-
> egroups.com...
> > Michael C Price wrote:
> >> Hi, I've been spending quite a lot of time over at
> >> Wikipedia in the past few months. It has a number of
> >> articles relating to nutrition:
> >>
> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Megavitamin_thearpy
> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Optimum_nutrition
> >>
> >> If you want to spread the message then join in and
> >> contribute with facts and fighting misinformation.
> >>
> >> Take the time to read about their editorial policiy,
> >> though. Original research is banned, so all statements
> >> should (in theory!) be backed up with references and
> >> written from a neutral point of view.
> >>
> >> Warning: Wikipedia is very additive (I confess I waste
> >> more time than I should in the physics related areas).
> >>
> >> - Michael C Price
> >
> > Thanks, but No Thanks! I have better things to do with
> > my time.
> >
> > Remember this, what you wrote yesterday on Wikipedia could
> > be deleted tomorrow by a total idiot. Wikipedia has
> > operationally proven that a bunch of chimps banging away
> > on a typewriter can in fact write something that passes
> > for an encyclopedia. :(
> >
> > Personally, I have been banned twice from Wikipedia. I
> > could edit, again today, but why bother? I put all my good
> > stuff on my own web site.
> >
> > It is about as anti-alternative medicine a place, as it
> > possibly could be. It IS also being runned by a
> > pornographer by the name of JimBo, the Bim Bo. :) Do NOT
> > forget their rather large collection of bigoted
> > MDs. One MD, without a life, happens to be an
> > Administrator there. Their number one objective is
> > to trash all alternative medicine articles.
> >
> > Be sure to check out Wikipedia's article on Tampons. It
> > has more significance to those clowns than anything on
> > alternative medicine. Need I say more?
Michael C
Sun, Aug-13-06, 17:16
That you've been banned is a good advert for Wikipedia.
Thanks!
- Michael C Price "Mr. Natural-Health"
<johngohde@naturalhealthperspective.com> wrote in
message news:1155409824.039779.308520@m79g2000cwm.googl-
egroups.com...
> Michael C Price wrote:
>> Hi, I've been spending quite a lot of time over at
>> Wikipedia in the past few months. It has a number of
>> articles relating to nutrition:
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Megavitamin_thearpy
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Optimum_nutrition
>>
>> If you want to spread the message then join in and
>> contribute with facts and fighting misinformation.
>>
>> Take the time to read about their editorial policiy,
>> though. Original research is banned, so all statements
>> should (in theory!) be backed up with references and
>> written from a neutral point of view.
>>
>> Warning: Wikipedia is very additive (I confess I waste
>> more time than I should in the physics related areas).
>>
>> - Michael C Price
>
> Thanks, but No Thanks! I have better things to do with
> my time.
>
> Remember this, what you wrote yesterday on Wikipedia could
> be deleted tomorrow by a total idiot. Wikipedia has
> operationally proven that a bunch of chimps banging away on
> a typewriter can in fact write something that passes for an
> encyclopedia. :(
>
> Personally, I have been banned twice from Wikipedia. I could
> edit, again today, but why bother? I put all my good stuff
> on my own web site.
>
> It is about as anti-alternative medicine a place, as it
> possibly could be. It IS also being runned by a pornographer
> by the name of JimBo, the Bim Bo. :) Do NOT forget their
> rather large collection of bigoted
> MDs. One MD, without a life, happens to be an
> Administrator there. Their number one objective is to
> trash all alternative medicine articles.
>
> Be sure to check out Wikipedia's article on Tampons. It has
> more significance to those clowns than anything on
> alternative medicine. Need I say more?
Copyright 2000-2009 Active Low-Carber Forums @ forum.lowcarber.org
vBulletin, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.