PDA

View Full Version : Archaeologist sets Yellowstone cultural record straight in book


Welcome to the Active Low-Carber Forums

Support for Atkins diet, Protein Power, Neanderthin (Paleo Diet), CAD/CALP, Dr. Bernstein Diabetes Solution and any other healthy low-carb diet or plan, all are welcome in our lowcarb community. Forget starvation and fad diets -- join the healthy eating crowd! You may register by clicking here, it's free!



Spiznet
Fri, Jul-21-06, 06:15
By ROBIN BEAVER Star-Tribune correspondent Thursday, July 20,
2006 [oas:casperstartribune.net/news/wyoming:Middle1]

As an archaeologist, Lawrence L. Loendorf spends much of his
time trekking through the basins and mountains of Wyoming
and Montana.

He digs for the truth, peeling away layers of history in
nature's landscape. He and other archaeologists recover
material remains so that this and future generations may
understand the origins of prehistoric and long-ago societies.

But recently, Loendorf's aim has been to expose layer
upon layer of untruths not found in the ground or on
rocks, but in literature that dates back to the days of
the early Yellowstone National Park and exploration of
the American West.

For the last decade, Loendorf has been working on his own
book, "Mountain Spirit: The Sheep Eater Indians of
Yellowstone," which presents a vivid picture of the vanished
way of life of the Sheep Eater Indians, a group whose
existence and accomplishments have been largely ignored in
histories of Native peoples.

"Mountain Spirit" endeavors to recreate the Sheep Eater way of
life before they were scattered on reservations.

The Sheep Eaters were a group of people who lived in the
higher altitudes of the Greater Yellowstone region in the
pre-park era and are tragically "maligned and misrepresented"
in Wyoming's literature and beyond, Loendorf said in a recent
interview.

Along with co-author Nancy Medaris Stone, Loendorf reveals how
the Sheep Eaters' reputation of being "feebleminded, cowardly,
defenseless dwarfs" has been perpetuated by numerous sources,
some of which are outright lies, say the authors.

In fact, they were advanced peoples who had a very functional
mountain life, posits Loendorf, a professor at New Mexico
State University whose research focuses on the Great Plains,
U.S. Southwest ethnography and rock art.

"They were healthy mountain people who were at the
topside of their culture," Loendorf added. "They were
magnificent people."

Changing the image of Indians

In 1994, Loendorf & Associates was granted a contract to do an
ethnographic overview of American Indians in Yellowstone. In
the course of their work, Loendorf, along with cultural
anthropologist Peter Nabokov, "discovered that there was
terrible, terrible misinformation about the Indians altogether
in Yellowstone."

At the same time, Michael Finley, the new park superintendent
at the time, held a three-day park-wide symposium. Yellowstone
workers, including rangers, interpreters -- and Loendorf --
were in the room.

Finley brought in Yellowstone historian and speaker Aubrey
Haines, who had written, among other things, a two-volume
series of the park. Haines "was a man of considerable
character," according to Loendorf, whose own talk focused on
how Indians in the pre-park days might have lived.

"And then Aubrey stood up -- a man whom I admired; a man who
was 'National Park Service' to the core; a man who was 'Mr.
Yellowstone.'"

Haines said, "'There were never any Indians in this park
except for a few Sheep Eaters, and they were poor for even
Indians.'"

It was a shocking statement, one that compelled Loendorf to
act: "I said to myself that day, 'I'm going to change the
image of Indians in Yellowstone National Park.'"

Unfounded rumors

Haines, though, was simply repeating what he had uncovered in
the research -- literature filled with untruths, much of which
is revealed in "Mountain Spirit."

In large part, early explorers who happened upon the Sheep
Eaters in their mountain environment had the impression that
they were powerless and even afraid of the geysers. In
reality, they used an intelligent approach and pulled back,
rather than put women and children in harm's way.

As described in "Mountain Spirit," Western explorers such as
Captain Benjamin Bonneville talked of a "hermit race, scanty
in number that inhabit the highest and most inaccessible
fastnesses. ...They have peculiarities of their own, which
distinguish them from all other Indians. They are miserably
poor; own no horses, and are destitute of every convenience to
be derived from an intercourse with the whites. .=2E.These
forlorn beings, forming a mere link between human nature and
the brute, have been looked down upon with pity and
contempt..."

In great measure, the mindset still goes on today, says
Loendorf.

Think about human beings and especially male interaction. If
somebody is considered to be a weakling, they don't measure
up, he explains. Take professional football or basketball, for
example. Players aren't "worthy warriors" if they don't
measure up.

"To some extent, the Sheep Eaters were considered non-worthy
warriors, because if people came into the mountains, they'd
retreat rather than engage in battle."

On the contrary, these Indians were fierce warriors who had
all of the weapons and everything they needed, so that if they
were cornered, they were perfectly capable of defending
themselves, according to Loendorf.

One cannot fault the U.S. government for its mission to
create something in the West as wonderful as Yellowstone
National Park. "What I fault," says Loendorf, "is that no one
has corrected the idea about what the Indians in the park
were like. They've continued, to this day, to use old
disparaging remarks."

Reader friendly

Nevertheless, "Mountain Spirit" is much more than a story
about falsehoods. Mostly, it illuminates the Sheep Eaters'
rich and abundant way of life.

It shows how these robust people constructed the most powerful
horn bows in North America, lived in well-constructed shelters
and made expertly tailored clothing.

An integral part of Sheep Eater culture was its large dogs,
"indispensable hunting and trekking companions," according
to the book.

Co-author Stone played a vital role in the manuscript,
says Loendorf.

Stone aimed to provide a "reader-friendly context" for
Loendorf's research - "one that would help readers appreciate
Sheep Eaters as living, breathing people and not simply
long-ignored figures from the past."

"Mountain Spirit" includes photographs, lithographs, and a
number of color drawings and sketches of Sheep Eater lifeways
by artist Dav=EDd Joaquin.

Joaquin used now-yellowed first printed edition of the Lewis
and Clark journals to study their clothing and lifestyles.

And, he used his imagination in depicting the Sheep Eaters.
His family raises Native dogs, and his father's dog Nasha was
used as a model for the book.

"Nasha has the instinct of her ancestors' dogs," says Joaquin.
"I take her for a walk, and she's got that herding instinct
and a broad back for carrying packs."

Loendorf will be signing books at Blue Heron in Casper
today from 3-6 p=2Em. For information, call the bookstore
at (307) 265-3774.

Robin Beaver is a freelance writer in Rock Springs, Wyo.

Rmacfarl
Fri, Jul-21-06, 06:15
spiznet wrote:
> By ROBIN BEAVER Star-Tribune correspondent Thursday, July
> 20, 2006 [oas:casperstartribune.net/news/wyoming:Middle1]

...

> The Sheep Eaters were a group of people who lived in the
> higher altitudes of the Greater Yellowstone region in the
> pre-park era and are tragically "maligned and
> misrepresented" in Wyoming's literature and beyond, Loendorf
> said in a recent interview.

...

Great story - thanks Spiz. So were they known as Sheep Eaters
because they hunted bighorns, or is it a derogatory term
because they were supposed to kill setters' sheep?

Ross Macfarlane

Dar Habel
Fri, Jul-21-06, 17:15
rmacfarl wrote:
> spiznet wrote:
> > By ROBIN BEAVER Star-Tribune correspondent Thursday, July
> > 20, 2006 [oas:casperstartribune.net/news/wyoming:Middle1]
>
> ...
>
> > The Sheep Eaters were a group of people who lived in the
> > higher altitudes of the Greater Yellowstone region in the
> > pre-park era and are tragically "maligned and
> > misrepresented" in Wyoming's literature and beyond,
> > Loendorf said in a recent interview.
>
> ...
>
> Great story - thanks Spiz. So were they known as Sheep
> Eaters because they hunted bighorns, or is it a derogatory
> term because they were supposed to kill setters' sheep?
>
> Ross Macfarlane

The "Sheep Eaters" of Yellowstone never were numerous. Native
groups called Sheep Eaters populated a wider area including
the "River of No Return" area of Idaho, the Beartooth Plateau
(NE of Yellowstone) in Montana, and the Absaroka and Wind
River Mountains of Wyoming (SE of Yellowstone). These groups
usually lived as an extended family of fewer than 10-20
individuals, generally within the range of Bighorn sheep
(which is a relatively high-altitude species), and included
hunting Bighorn sheep in their repertoire (I have visited a
Sheep Eater archaeological site in the Wind Rivers, where
Bighorns were driven into a brush and rock chute, narrowing
to a net corral). They are widely regarded as being of
Shosone affiliation, but they were not "horsemen". There can
be little doubt that the Sheep Eaters have been maligned and
misrepresented in the primary literature, as written by the
explorers and early historians documenting the discovery and
recorded history of the Yellowstone ecosystem (I have a lot
of this in my personal library), but I can imagine that
Loendorf and others are promoting their book as a needed (Buy
my book) politically correct revision. Sheep Eater economy
was pretty basic.

But maybe Loendorf has a point and I need to be re-educated.
I'll be interested in eventually reading the book, whenever it
arrives in my library or becomes available for less than $50.

Dar

richardpar
Sat, Jul-22-06, 17:16
Dar Habel wrote:
> rmacfarl wrote:
> > spiznet wrote:
> > > By ROBIN BEAVER Star-Tribune correspondent Thursday,
> > > July 20, 2006
> > > [oas:casperstartribune.net/news/wyoming:Middle1]
> >
> > ...
> >
> > > The Sheep Eaters were a group of people who lived in the
> > > higher altitudes of the Greater Yellowstone region in
> > > the pre-park era and are tragically "maligned and
> > > misrepresented" in Wyoming's literature and beyond,
> > > Loendorf said in a recent interview.
> >
> > ...
> >
> > Great story - thanks Spiz. So were they known as Sheep
> > Eaters because they hunted bighorns, or is it a derogatory
> > term because they were supposed to kill setters' sheep?
> >
> > Ross Macfarlane
>
> The "Sheep Eaters" of Yellowstone never were numerous.
> Native groups called Sheep Eaters populated a wider area
> including the "River of No Return" area of Idaho, the
> Beartooth Plateau (NE of Yellowstone) in Montana, and the
> Absaroka and Wind River Mountains of Wyoming (SE of
> Yellowstone). These groups usually lived as an extended
> family of fewer than 10-20 individuals, generally within the
> range of Bighorn sheep (which is a relatively high-altitude
> species), and included hunting Bighorn sheep in their
> repertoire (I have visited a Sheep Eater archaeological site
> in the Wind Rivers, where Bighorns were driven into a brush
> and rock chute, narrowing to a net corral). They are widely
> regarded as being of Shosone affiliation, but they were not
> "horsemen". There can be little doubt that the Sheep Eaters
> have been maligned and misrepresented in the primary
> literature, as written by the explorers and early historians
> documenting the discovery and recorded history of the
> Yellowstone ecosystem (I have a lot of this in my personal
> library), but I can imagine that Loendorf and others are
> promoting their book as a needed (Buy my book) politically
> correct revision. Sheep Eater economy was pretty basic.
>
> But maybe Loendorf has a point and I need to be
> re-educated. I'll be interested in eventually reading the
> book, whenever it arrives in my library or becomes
> available for less than $50.
>
> Dar

It seems that any perfectly viable native hunter/gatherer, or
even agricultural community, anywhere, can be derogated by
such names as 'Sheep Eaters' by new colonialists, of whatever
race or persuasion, as demonstrated by the other post
hereabouts about 'Anglo-Saxon Apartheid'*, and what's
happening right now in the Levant, and will eventually and
conveniently disappear altogether.

That's the way of humanity, and seems perfectly acceptable to
anthropologists when it happens in other countries, or at
other times.

When it happens in your own country, in your own (or your
grandfather's) time, then it brings the horrible injustices
home to roost. If you then begin to appreciate that your own
privileged position depends largely on a forgotten or
intentionally covered-up series of atrocities then you're well
on the way to a personally unbiassed and 'scientific' view of
your country's history.

I am fairly confident that the generation before Ross or Dar
did not have the same enlightened view about their country's
indigenous peoples that they have.

*I am an 'English snob', a direct descendant of Norman
invaders (I like to pretend), and therefore quite innocent of
the evil apartheid practiced by the Anglo-Saxons. What my
forebears did to put them down in turn, was quite acceptable,
because I am comfortable as a result.

regards

Richard

Dar Habel
Sun, Jul-23-06, 17:16
richardparker01@yahoo.com wrote: (snip)
> It seems that any perfectly viable native hunter/gatherer,
> or even agricultural community, anywhere, can be derogated
> by such names as 'Sheep Eaters' by new colonialists, of
> whatever race or persuasion, as demonstrated by the other
> post hereabouts about 'Anglo-Saxon Apartheid'*, and what's
> happening right now in the Levant, and will eventually and
> conveniently disappear altogether.
>
> That's the way of humanity, and seems perfectly acceptable
> to anthropologists when it happens in other countries, or at
> other times.
>
> When it happens in your own country, in your own (or your
> grandfather's) time, then it brings the horrible injustices
> home to roost. If you then begin to appreciate that your own
> privileged position depends largely on a forgotten or
> intentionally covered-up series of atrocities then you're
> well on the way to a personally unbiassed and 'scientific'
> view of your country's history.
>
> I am fairly confident that the generation before Ross or Dar
> did not have the same enlightened view about their country's
> indigenous peoples that they have.
>
> *I am an 'English snob', a direct descendant of Norman
> invaders (I like to pretend), and therefore quite innocent
> of the evil apartheid practiced by the Anglo-Saxons. What my
> forebears did to put them down in turn, was quite
> acceptable, because I am comfortable as a result.
>
> regards
>
> Richard

As an amateur student of the history of the Yellowstone
ecosystem, I've collected most of the historical
information available about the native groups called
"Sheep Eaters" or sometimes "Sheepeaters" or
"sheepeaters". The appelation probably can be considered
derogatory, but that's a situation for which the
historians are to blame. I don't know what's in this new
book until I have read it (which I eventually will do),
but I can say that by the time the first fur traders
reached the area inhabited by these "Sheepeaters" (about
1820-1840), they were not numerous (my guess is less than
a thousand total), and were encountered in very small
groups (a few to about 20 max), when they were encounted
at all. Generally, "Sheepeaters" did their best to avoid
contact with the white devils, so whenever a "Sheepeater"
group was encountered, and more importantly, recorded for
history, the description of their material culture has to
be considered biased by small sampling. "Sheepeater"
material culture is always described as minimal, but that
says nothing about what might have been left undescribed
about their culture. To be honest, I don't think much is
known of these people. They did their best to avoid
contact with white "historians". One of the best
documented accounts is that of the "Sheepeater War" in
the Salmon River drainage, when some of the last of the
"wild" Sheepeaters were placed on the Fort Hall
reservation in 1879.

http://www.suite101.com/article.cfm/old_west/68941/2

Of course, these Idaho "Sheepeaters" were some of the last
survivors of populations that never were large, and always
seemed to be driven deeper into the less-than-optimal survival
opportunities of the mountainous country as other populations
(both native and white) encroached upon the better country in
the foothills and plains.

If this new book doesn't propose another name for the "Sheep
Eaters", it is just as guilty of perpetuating the name as are
the old historical versions. Perhaps this new book will "dress
up" the "Sheepeaters", but until I've read it, I have to
wonder just how much is PC and how much is real historical
fact. I can recognize the bad treatment, but I won't apologize
for the bad treatment given these folks by my "ancestors". We
are "white devils" in the eyes of many of the world's
populations because of the sins of our ancestors (or in some
cases, current Texas cowboys now moved to DC.).

Dar