PDA

View Full Version : Another gem needs preservation

Welcome to the Active Low-Carber Forums

Support for Atkins diet, Protein Power, Neanderthin (Paleo Diet), CAD/CALP, Dr. Bernstein Diabetes Solution and any other healthy low-carb diet or plan, all are welcome in our lowcarb community. Forget starvation and fad diets -- join the healthy eating crowd! You may register by clicking here, it's free!



richardpar
Thu, Jul-13-06, 06:23
> See, Ross, it isn't just bad ideas that stick around for
> years and years.
>
> Jois
Rmacfarl
Thu, Jul-13-06, 06:23
richardparker01@yahoo.com wrote:

[Nothing actually...]

So: if you choose to accept the terms: what is it about AAH
that, in your opinion, is so desperately misunderstood by the
scientific community...

Ross Macfarlane
Spiznet
Thu, Jul-13-06, 06:23
Jois wrote:
> "Claudius Denk" <cladiusdenk@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:NpEsg.169437$F_3.27181@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net...
> >
> > "rmacfarl" <rmacfarl@alphalink.com.au> wrote in message
> > news:44af7ec2_2@news.chariot.net.au...
> > >
> > > "prd" <X_header@address.net> wrote in message news:qzpr-
> > > g.102385$mF2.71253@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> > >> In sci.anthropology.paleo message news:1152155962.8595-
> > >> 74.152590@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com by "rmacfarl"
> > >> <rmacfarl@alphalink.com.au> . . . :
> > >>
> > >>>
> > >>> richardparker01@yahoo.com wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> [Nothing actually...]
> > >>>
> > >>> So: if you choose to accept the terms: what is it
> > >>> about AAH that, in your opinion, is so desperately
> > >>> misunderstood by the scientific community...
> > >>
> > >> The accurate clinical diagnosis of the underlying
> > >> mental conditions of its proponents?
> > >>
> > >
> > > Including, in this case, an unwillingness to naddress a
> > > direct question? Moral cowardice, perhaps?
> >
> > C'mon Ross. You're the most evasive twit here!
> >
> Not fair. I've been busy evading elsewhere and feel I
> haven't been given a fair chance.
>
> Jois
>
Evasion is the refuge of the brilliant! Especially if you
can evade all them crocs, leeches and skeeters that
infest the AAT.

>
> --
> AFAICT AAT still hasn't been defined. The sense I get from
> reading this group is that you support AAT if you think that
> water was more important in human evolution than the person
> that you're talking to does.
>
> pete 092705

Yes: WATER is the driving force behind all evolution, just
like land, air, wood and fire!!!
Paul Crowl
Thu, Jul-13-06, 06:23
"rmacfarl" <rmacfarl@alphalink.com.au> wrote in message
news:1152155962.859574.152590@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...

> So: if you choose to accept the terms: what is it about AAH
> that, in your opinion, is so desperately misunderstood by
> the scientific community...

Ask instead: 'What is understood by the scientific community?'

When you work out that the answer is 'zilch', you'll then
realise that the word 'scientific' should be put in quotes.
The 'community' exists for one purpose only: the cheque at the
end of the month.

It misunderstands pretty nearly every scientific principle.
That is all that matters.

Asking how it misunderstands the AAH is like asking whether
medieval alchemists understood Aristotle, or whether Osama Bin
Laden understands L. Ron Hubbard.

Who could possibly care, or want to know?

Paul.
Prd
Thu, Jul-13-06, 06:23
In sci.anthropology.paleo message
news:1152155962.859574.152590@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com by
"rmacfarl" <rmacfarl@alphalink.com.au> . . . :

>
> richardparker01@yahoo.com wrote:
>
> [Nothing actually...]
>
> So: if you choose to accept the terms: what is it about AAH
> that, in your opinion, is so desperately misunderstood by
> the scientific community...

The accurate clinical diagnosis of the underlying mental
conditions of its proponents?
Marc Verha
Thu, Jul-13-06, 06:23
"prd" <X_header@address.net> wrote in message news:qzprg.1023-
85$mF2.71253@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...

> > So: if you choose to accept the terms: what is it about
> > AAH that, in your opinion, is so desperately misunderstood
> > by the scientific community...

> The accurate clinical diagnosis of the underlying mental
> conditions of its proponents?

My little prd, ever read
http://allserv.rug.ac.be/~mvaneech/outthere.htm ? What
underlining condition does the author have? Don't answer,
you're killfiled.
Rmacfarl
Thu, Jul-13-06, 06:23
"prd" <X_header@address.net> wrote in message news:qzprg.1023-
85$mF2.71253@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> In sci.anthropology.paleo message
> news:1152155962.859574.152590@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com
> by "rmacfarl" <rmacfarl@alphalink.com.au> . . . :
>
>>
>> richardparker01@yahoo.com wrote:
>>
>> [Nothing actually...]
>>
>> So: if you choose to accept the terms: what is it about AAH
>> that, in your opinion, is so desperately misunderstood by
>> the scientific community...
>
> The accurate clinical diagnosis of the underlying mental
> conditions of its proponents?
>

Including, in this case, an unwillingness to naddress a direct
question? Moral cowardice, perhaps?

Ross Macfarlane
Claudius D
Thu, Jul-13-06, 06:23
"rmacfarl" <rmacfarl@alphalink.com.au> wrote in message
news:44af7ec2_2@news.chariot.net.au...
>
> "prd" <X_header@address.net> wrote in message news:qzprg.10-
> 2385$mF2.71253@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
>> In sci.anthropology.paleo message
>> news:1152155962.859574.152590@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com
>> by "rmacfarl" <rmacfarl@alphalink.com.au> . . . :
>>
>>>
>>> richardparker01@yahoo.com wrote:
>>>
>>> [Nothing actually...]
>>>
>>> So: if you choose to accept the terms: what is it about
>>> AAH that, in your opinion, is so desperately misunderstood
>>> by the scientific community...
>>
>> The accurate clinical diagnosis of the underlying mental
>> conditions of its proponents?
>>
>
> Including, in this case, an unwillingness to naddress a
> direct question? Moral cowardice, perhaps?

C'mon Ross. You're the most evasive twit here!
Jois
Thu, Jul-13-06, 06:23
"Claudius Denk" <cladiusdenk@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:NpEsg.169437$F_3.27181@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net...
>
> "rmacfarl" <rmacfarl@alphalink.com.au> wrote in message
> news:44af7ec2_2@news.chariot.net.au...
> >
> > "prd" <X_header@address.net> wrote in message news:qzprg.-
> > 102385$mF2.71253@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> >> In sci.anthropology.paleo message news:1152155962.859574-
> >> .152590@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com by "rmacfarl"
> >> <rmacfarl@alphalink.com.au> . . . :
> >>
> >>>
> >>> richardparker01@yahoo.com wrote:
> >>>
> >>> [Nothing actually...]
> >>>
> >>> So: if you choose to accept the terms: what is it about
> >>> AAH that, in your opinion, is so desperately
> >>> misunderstood by the scientific community...
> >>
> >> The accurate clinical diagnosis of the underlying mental
> >> conditions of its proponents?
> >>
> >
> > Including, in this case, an unwillingness to naddress a
> > direct question? Moral cowardice, perhaps?
>
> C'mon Ross. You're the most evasive twit here!
>
Not fair. I've been busy evading elsewhere and feel I haven't
been given a fair chance.

Jois

--
AFAICT AAT still hasn't been defined. The sense I get from
reading this group is that you support AAT if you think that
water was more important in human evolution than the person
that you're talking to does.

pete 092705