PDA

View Full Version : The real reason why processed meats are so dangerous to your health


Welcome to the Active Low-Carber Forums

Support for Atkins diet, Protein Power, Neanderthin (Paleo Diet), CAD/CALP, Dr. Bernstein Diabetes Solution and any other healthy low-carb diet or plan, all are welcome in our lowcarb community. Forget starvation and fad diets -- join the healthy eating crowd! You may register by clicking here, it's free!



MyJourney
Sat, Jul-08-06, 12:50
http://www.newstarget.com/011148.html
Originally published August 21 2005

The real reason why processed meats are so dangerous to your health


Have you ever wondered why the consumption of processed meats is so strongly linked to cancers of the colon, breast, prostate and pancreas? The evidence continues to mount, as demonstrated by a recent study showing a 67% increase in pancreatic cancer for people consuming moderate amounts of processed meat on a frequent basis. (Pulse; 4/23/2005, Vol. 65 Issue 16, p10).
Conventional medical doctors and nutrition researchers tend to put the bulk of the blame on the saturated fat content of processed meats, but that ignores two notable culprits that I think are far worse offenders when it comes to human health. Let's take a closer look at these two problems with processed meats.

The first problem is found in the fats of these processed meats. The problem isn't the fat molecules themselves, but rather the toxic chemicals, heavy metals and environmental pollutants that are found inside those fat molecules.

You see, fat tissues -- whether in a cow or a human -- tend to concentrate whatever pollutants are found in the mainstay diet of the animal. A cow eats literally tons of grass in its lifetime, and in doing so, it collects and concentrates low-level pollutants found in its diet. For non-organic beef, it's quite common to find trace amounts of heavy metals (mercury, cadmium), pesticides, and even PCBs. That's because, for non-organic beef, feed practices are rather horrifying. You'd be shocked to learn what's perfectly legal to feed to cows intended for human consumption.

So while conventional doctors tend to put the health risk blame on the saturated fat found in meat products, I think it has a lot more to do with the toxic substances concentrated in those fat tissues. A cow is much like a land bottom-feeder, and eating meat from a non-organic cow is a lot like eating shrimp from the bottom of the ocean.

These toxins, when consumed, are clearly and unquestionably linked to cancers as well as nervous system disorders that can accelerate Alzheimer's disease and dementia. They also stress the liver and impair immune system function. The human body should never be exposed to mercury, PCBs or the rocket fuel chemicals that are now almost universally found in cows' milk products across the country (in a 2005 Texas Tech University study, perchlorate was detected in 46 of 47 store-bought samples of cows' milk across 11 states).

The second (and more important) reason processed meats are so strongly correlated with cancer is, I believe, the continued use of a cancer-promoting additive called sodium nitrite.

This ingredient, which sounds harmless, is actually highly carcinogenic once it enters the human digestive system. There, it forms a variety of nitrosamine compounds that enter the bloodstream and wreak havoc with a number of internal organs: the liver and pancreas in particular. Sodium nitrite is widely regarded as a toxic ingredient, and the USDA actually tried to ban this additive in the 1970's but was vetoed by food manufacturers who complained they had no alternative for preserving packaged meat products.

You can find sodium nitrite in nearly every packaged meat product imaginable. It's listed right on the label of products like bacon, breakfast sausage, beef jerky, pepperoni, sandwich meat, ham, hot dogs, and even the meats found in canned soups. If you and I walked into any grocery store in America, I could show you hundreds of products that contain this ingredient right now. And I believe this sodium nitrite is the primary cause of pancreatic cancer in humans who consume even moderate quantities of processed meats.

If sodium nitrite is so dangerous, why does the food industry use it? Simple: this chemical just happens to turn meats bright red. It's actually a color fixer, and it makes old, dead meats appear fresh and vibrant. Thus, food manufacturers insist on using sodium nitrite for the simple reason that it sells more meat products. Consumers are strongly influenced by the color of grocery products (which is why Florida oranges are often dipped in red dye, by the way), and when meat products look fresh, people will buy them, even if the true color of the months-old meat is putrid gray.

There is a way to minimize the damage from sodium nitrite, by the way. You won't hear this from the USDA these days, since the department doesn't really want to discuss sodium nitrite at all. Since the 1970's, the USDA has shifted into protection mode of the very industries it was supposed to regulate... to the point where it now acts as more of a marketing branch of the beef, milk and grain industries.

The proven protection strategy is to consume fairly large doses of vitamins C and E before dietary exposure to sodium nitrite. This nutritional protection strategy inhibits the conversion of sodium nitrite to cancer-causing nitrosamines. Personally, I would never consume any processed meat products, but if you choose to do so, you can reduce your risk of cancer from sodium nitrite by consuming these antioxidants before your meal.

Consuming chlorella before or during meals with meat will also theoretically protect you from various environmental pollutants. Chlorella is well known to bind to heavy metals in particular, shepherding them out of your body before they can do much damage. Personally, I take chlorella any time I eat seafood for this very purpose.

You can also, of course, turn to fresh, organic, free-range meat. That's the safest approach for any meat consumer. Yes, it's expensive, but last time I checked, treating pancreatic cancer was a bit on the pricey side, too.

There are other problems with processed meats, nutritionally speaking. Meat has zero fiber, for one thing. But in terms of the major causative factors of disease in the human body, I believe the two primary culprits are the heavy metals and toxins concentrated in the fat tissues of cows, combined with the sodium nitrite additives used by meat processing companies to preserve their products and give them enhanced visual appeal.

And thus, the saturated fat argument is a distraction from the real causes of cancer that the U.S. beef industry doesn't want to talk about. It's not the saturated fat that causes pancreatic cancer. For example, coconut oil consumption wouldn't cause a person's risk of pancreatic cancer to leap 67%, although it's still saturated fat. The real cause of the cancer, I believe, is what's found INSIDE the fat, and what's ADDED to the meat during processing and packaging.

mike_d
Sat, Jul-08-06, 16:12
The ole "health ranger" strikes again.Since the 1970's, the USDA has shifted into protection mode of the very industries it was supposed to regulate... to the point where it now acts as more of a marketing branch of the beef, milk and grain industries.

Ain't that the truth? My dad was on low-carb and had a lot of fried hot dogs, sausage and drank rivers of diet soda. He got bladder cancer, he was 74 and also smoked for 20 years though.

inkamin
Sun, Jul-09-06, 02:50
So how about processed poultry products - like butterball turkey slices?

mirielle
Sun, Jul-09-06, 06:53
So how about processed poultry products - like butterball turkey slices?

They probably are terrible for you even though they don't contain nitrates and nitrites. They are chip chopped chicken and turkey parts put together with filler. I don't even by cold cuts.

I avoid all processed meats except for prosciutto, smoked salmon, and once in awhile, corned beef. I read all the labels and the labels scare me.

We just found some hot dogs at Trader Joes that don't contain the nitrates and nitrites. Read the label and they looked pretty safe. We did buy a pack. I love hotdogs, sauerkraut and mustard.

MyJourney
Sun, Jul-09-06, 12:41
I thought processed turkey etc. does contain nitrites.

Jenn123
Mon, Jul-10-06, 10:34
I get my meat from the mennonite community... Tastes incredible. You honestly won't eat regular meat from the supermarket again. If you haven't had organic/mennonite bacon you're missing a lot. :)

Only thing I can't get from the mennonites are lamb and veal (they don't kill the baby animals I guess). I eat these in limited quantities. But nothing beats the hormone and chemcial free mennonite meats.

tom sawyer
Mon, Jul-10-06, 11:20
This article is a bunch of hooey. What exactly IS the correlation between processed meats and cancer? Any actual data on a cause-and-effect, or how good the correlation is? Any data is necessarily going to be epidemiological BS, since you can't break out processed meat from every other factor that goes along with eating lots of baloney. As in, the big hogey roll and bag of chips, the six pack and the good smoke afterwards. A diet high in processed meat is going to statisitcally go along with a lot of other bad habits, and isolating one and blaming it for the problems with the lifestyle, is practically impossible in a realistic sense.

Regarding traces of pollutants found in foods, I can tell you that the technology today allows such small quantities to be detected that there is practically nothing that can't be found at some level, the thing is that the levels are so low that there is no way they are going to have any effect. So freaking out because milk supposedly contains perchlorate (at what concentration?) is unneccessary.

Do I think eating a lot of processed meat is a good idea? Not really. But this article goes way overboard in insinuating the level of risk involved.

LC FP
Mon, Jul-10-06, 17:14
So freaking out because milk supposedly contains perchlorate
As an aside, in the 50s and 60s it was found that cow's milk contained measureable amounts of Strontium 90, from atmospheric atom bomb testing. (That's why they agreed to a test ban.) It was incorporated into the grass, concentrated by the cows, then absorbed by kids and incorporated into their growing bones. Strontium 90 has a half-life of 89,000 years, so it's probably still there. Those kids, BTW, were us! (or at least me and my generation).

Azlocarb
Mon, Jul-10-06, 17:35
Cancers are more then just a cause. There is also the fact that the body is supposed to detect and kill the cancerous cells before they have a chance to cause damage. There is evidence the vegetable oils(Polyunsaturated fats mostly) seriously effect our immune system, so much so that before immune depressing drugs were developed they were used to keep the first organ transplants from rejecting the transplanted tissue. It worked so good at suppressing the immune system that the patients developed cancers. Here is a link that is very informative
http://www.second-opinions.co.uk/fats_and_cancer.html

So to say that anyone thing causes cancer you must look at what may be causing the immune system to stop doing its job.

ItsTheWooo
Mon, Jul-10-06, 18:11
This article is a bunch of hooey. What exactly IS the correlation between processed meats and cancer? Any actual data on a cause-and-effect, or how good the correlation is? Any data is necessarily going to be epidemiological BS, since you can't break out processed meat from every other factor that goes along with eating lots of baloney.

Do I think eating a lot of processed meat is a good idea? Not really. But this article goes way overboard in insinuating the level of risk involved.
100% agreement :)


Cancers are more then just a cause. There is also the fact that the body is supposed to detect and kill the cancerous cells before they have a chance to cause damage.
So to say that anyone thing causes cancer you must look at what may be causing the immune system to stop doing its job.
An excellent point as well. I'm not so sure PUFA are actually that powerful of an immunosuppressant (I have to read more about that) I do definitely think cancer is primarily an issue of impaired immunity somehow, before it is an issue of "stuff" giving us cancer.

tom sawyer
Tue, Jul-11-06, 15:45
Eating LC seems to boost my immune system, or at least it keeps me from being in a state of high alert with respect to irritants that cause inflammation. It seems reasonable to believe that if your system is constsantly inflamed unnecessarily, eventually this could lead to formation of cancerous cells. That, along with just simply being more healthy, may well reduce the chances of contracting cancer.

Cancer is a tough nut to crack though, there are all sorts of causes and all sorts of factors which influence one's chances of getting it or not. There are some obvious things to avoid, such as smoking, but I'm not sure processed meats would fall into a similar category. There is a lot lacking in showing that ingestion of nitrates leads through a pathway of nitrosamines and subsequently to cancer of one kind or another. Its all theory, the fact that it sounds reasonable at first blush does not convince me. Low fat diets sound reasonable at first blush.

We ingest a lot of organic compounds that contain nitrogen in both nitrate and ammonia form. Much of it is broken down and rebuilt into other forms. I think we have a mechanism of dealing with this. Whether eating too much pastrami overloads this mechansim, I can't say. But if so, then what a way to go!

ceberezin
Tue, Jul-11-06, 17:16
A little common sense about carcinogens. It's erroneous to think that carcinogens cause cancer. Instead, carcinogens tend to cause random mutations in cells, random being the important word here. Only a tiny fraction of those mutations are cancerous. Even so, it's the job of the immune system to recognize and destroy mutated cells of all varieties. Carcinogens occur naturally; they come from industrial food processing; and even from simple cooking. It's impossible to avoid carcinogens completely, although avoiding the man-made ones introduced into our environment is probably a good idea. The best defense against cancer is to have finely tuned immune system, and LCing leads to that better than anything else.


As for PUFAs suppressing the immune system, what I read is that in the early work on organ transplants, researchers were looking for something to suppress the immune system to prevent tissue rejection. They put organ transplant patients on high doses of sunflower seed oil because they knew that PUFAs were very effective immunosuppressants. However, they also noticed that people on high doses of sunflower seed oil were also developing numerous tumors, so they went to plan B to avoid that reaction.

However powerful PUFAs are as immunosuppressants, let's remember that for the past thirty-five years, nutritionists have been telling people that PUFAs are healthier than SFAs and that we should eat more of them, and food processors and others have complied. It's hard to believe that increases in cancer rates are unrelated to this bad advice.

tom sawyer
Wed, Jul-12-06, 08:24
So is nitrate considered man-made or is it a natural compound that has a mild carcinogenic effect? And anyone know what sort of carinogenicity potential nitrate actually has in humans?

PUFAs are able to be manufactured through corporate-style farming practices. That is why they are being pushed. Hard to grow olives in an industrial scale. I prefer canola, at least its got a lot of MUFAs.

ChicknLady
Wed, Jul-12-06, 18:40
Maybe a half-year ago, there was an article posted here in the LC Research/Media site about nitrates. If I remember correctly, there were some supposedly huge health BENEFITS from nitrates due to some sort of anti-inflammatory properties. I recall posting a wise-crack about hotdogs being the "new health food". Anybody rememeber this article, or am I mixing up my nitrates and nitrites?

kallyn
Wed, Jul-12-06, 21:00
So is nitrate considered man-made or is it a natural compound that has a mild carcinogenic effect?

Nitrites were naturally present in the salt that the ancient Romans used to cure meat, and have been in use ever since then. You might see it referred to in older writings or sausage recipes as "salt peter." It isn't a modern invention.