PDA

View Full Version : obesity-related economic melt-down


Welcome to the Active Low-Carber Forums

Support for Atkins diet, Protein Power, Neanderthin (Paleo Diet), CAD/CALP, Dr. Bernstein Diabetes Solution and any other healthy low-carb diet or plan, all are welcome in our lowcarb community. Forget starvation and fad diets -- join the healthy eating crowd! You may register by clicking here, it's free!



kwikdriver
Tue, May-16-06, 16:27
Obesity threatens not only our physical health, but also the health of our economies, the European Commissioner for Health and Consumer Protection said in his closing speech at last weeks EU - US Conference on Diet Physical Activity and Health.

"This is a common challenge that we are facing, the biggest health threat of the twenty first century," said Markos Kyprianou.
"This conference has helped us give a new transatlantic perspective to our debate on nutrition and physical activity."

Perspective is certainly needed. It is estimated for example that obesity accounts for up to 7 per cent of direct health care costs. Kyprianou believes that this will further increase given the rising obesity trends.

"The wider costs to the economy working days lost, early retirement - are even more worrying, "he said.

"In fact, it is estimated that the percentage of disability-adjusted life years lost due to obesity, poor nutrition and physical inactivity is even higher than that due to smoking."

As last weeks discussion made clear, there is not one single solution to this problem. This view is reflected in the European Platform for Action on Diet, Physical Activity and Health, which brings together key EU-level representatives of the food, retail, catering, and advertising industries, consumer organisations and health NGOs.

This approach has been welcomed by the food and drink industry, which has long argued that the industry should not bear sole responsibility for the current obesity crisis.

"There is still room for progress in a number of areas and a crucial need to put in place a real monitoring and evaluation framework for all the Platform initiatives," said Kyprianou. "Unless we have proper monitoring, the Platform will lack credibility."

Of course, there is already a body of EC food law which is relevant to nutrition and will have impact on consumers ability to make informed choices. One is the Nutrition and Health Claims proposal, which was adopted in July 2003 and contains rules for use of claims on food.

The proposal is in its second reading in Parliament. The main elements of the proposal are the requirement for nutrient profiling to be able to make a claim and the authorisation procedure for health claims.

"Another piece of legislation I wish to mention is the Proposal for a Regulation on the addition of vitamins and minerals and of certain other substances to foods adopted in 2003."

"This regulation establishes a list of vitamins or minerals that may be added to food while providing specific rules on labelling. It will also include criteria for the establishment of maximum/minimum levels of vitamins and minerals in food."

This proposal is now also in its second reading. But Kyprianou believes that while legislation can and should play an important part in tackling obesity, it is just a part of the solution.

"Overweight and obesity are rapidly reaching epidemic proportions on both sides of the Atlantic," he concluded. "400,000 more children become obese every year in the EU, and obesity has doubled in the US in the last decade.

"We all have a share of the blame, a share of responsibility, and we all have to be part of the solution."

http://www.foodnavigator.com/news/ng.asp?n=67691-obesity-health-threat-nutrition

cbcb
Tue, May-16-06, 22:42
Was there really a lot less carb ingestion in, say, the 30s, 40s and 50s vs. today? Just randomly still amazed at the current diabetes rates and wondering if there might not be *some random chemical - not just CHO* that is abetting the epidemic?!

kwikdriver
Tue, May-16-06, 22:47
Was there really a lot less carb ingestion in, say, the 30s, 40s and 50s vs. today? Just randomly still amazed at the current diabetes rates and wondering if there might not be *some random chemical - not just CHO* that is abetting the epidemic?!

If it's some chemical it's probably spread by American fast food outlets, because soon after McDonald's and friends start opening up in a country, that country's obesity and diabetes rates begin climbing.

ojoj
Wed, May-17-06, 01:31
I'm convinced our "problems" in society are more to do with actual SUGAR and sugary snacks! I'm sure when we were all kids that it just wasnt as freely available. As a child I was allowed to go to the sweety shop once a week, cakes, chocolate bars, bikkies, cookies, were concidered a treat and we just didnt have things like that readily available in the house. Nowadays sugary snacks are just everywhere and eaten without even a thought.

Macdonalds etc. are also a big part of the problem, as are ready meals, processed food, chemicals in our food....

Jo

AJCole
Wed, May-17-06, 04:22
In fact, sugar consumption has gone way up. However this has occured along with the rise in usage of vegetable oils and unsaturated fats, which are often rancid due to chemical processing. Also, while veg oil usage has risen, overall fat intake has decreased. I believe that saturated fats are not only more stable, but include high amounts of vitamins which make them even more protective. Increase sugar, decrease fats, compromise quality of fat, kill all the enzymes, and throw in chemicals. That is the problem with the western diet. Westen A. Price would be horrified by where we have gone.

cindie
Wed, May-17-06, 06:12
I think too that people are looking for a quick fix meal due to running the "rat race". They are relying on packaged dinners, fast food and pre-fab meals. Taking time to put thought into the nutritional value of meals just isn't there. It takes effort and planning and I think a lot of people don't make this a priority in their lives.

LC_Dave
Wed, May-17-06, 06:21
Is codex being established in the EU ?

cbcb
Wed, May-17-06, 08:26
In fact, sugar consumption has gone way up. However this has occured along with the rise in usage of vegetable oils and unsaturated fats, which are often rancid due to chemical processing. Also, while veg oil usage has risen, overall fat intake has decreased. I believe that saturated fats are not only more stable, but include high amounts of vitamins which make them even more protective. Increase sugar, decrease fats, compromise quality of fat, kill all the enzymes, and throw in chemicals. That is the problem with the western diet. Westen A. Price would be horrified by where we have gone.

Well put. Wonder if there's been a concurrent rise in MSG consumption? Although the cocktail you mentioned above just might do it. There was also the replacement of sugar in soft drinks with corn syrup. Here's a chart tracking that alongside the obesity epidemic:
http://www.ajcn.org/cgi/content-nw/full/79/4/537/F1

That's from this journal article on corn syrup and obesity:
http://www.ajcn.org/cgi/content/full/79/4/537

Frogbreath
Wed, May-17-06, 10:46
When I was a child in the 50s & 60s, we never ate out. I have no memory of any meal eaten anywhere other than home. There were a few junky things (Twinkies?) that appeared in my lunch box one year, but I didn't eat them because it was too much. The only junky thing I remember being advertised was sugary cereal - which my mom never bought. Eating behavior has changed tremendously over the last few decades and most kids don't have a mom who's at home to plan meals and cook - and I'm not advocating a return to that plan either. It's just that what we're doing now isn't working very well.

kaypeeoh
Wed, May-17-06, 11:26
I assume in the 30's and 40's people worked. Not sitting at a keyboard but physical labor. If you see photos of people taken in the 30's some are short and muscular and some are tall and lean but none seem to have excess body fat. Low carb gurus say it's because junk food hadn't been invented yet. I think it was a combination of less food in general and a more physical existence.

People had coca cola and it probably was quite cheap. But if working hard the sugar was helpful. It didn't stay in the bloodstream long enough to stimulate fat formation.

Frogbreath
Thu, May-18-06, 07:18
Not everybody worked hard and most still didn't get fat, and I doubt that sugar was helpful - ever.

poppy-ko
Tue, May-23-06, 20:17
I watched a documentary on Arirang (Korean channel) about obesity in Asia. One thing that particularly struck me was their description of how the rates of obesity and Crohn's Disease had skyrocketed since the introduction of American fast food outlets on the island. Apparently places like McDonald's have attractively priced food to lure in American service people from the naval base. Poorer Japanese also eat this food as it can be cheaper than even locally produced whole foods. In just two generations obesity has gone from relatively rare to a considerable percentage of the Okinawan population.

I really didn't know much about Crohn's Disease until watching this documentary. I have read the cause of it is still unknown and that diet probably has no bearing on it, but it seems awfully coincidental that Crohn's Disease was almost unknown while McDonald's was unknown, too.

kebaldwin
Wed, May-24-06, 02:45
This is tied into the other article in this forum about soaring obesity in the poor.