PDA

View Full Version : Rev Up Your Metabolism-Lean Protein helps you burn fat


Welcome to the Active Low-Carber Forums

Support for Atkins diet, Protein Power, Neanderthin (Paleo Diet), CAD/CALP, Dr. Bernstein Diabetes Solution and any other healthy low-carb diet or plan, all are welcome in our lowcarb community. Forget starvation and fad diets -- join the healthy eating crowd! You may register by clicking here, it's free!



Judynyc
Sun, Feb-26-06, 20:44
Rev up your metabolism
Adding lean protein helps you burn fat -- even while you sleep. But balance your diet with healthful carbs and fats.

By Sally Squires
Special to The Times

February 25, 2006, 8:13 PM EST

The weight loss world is full of claims, rarely proven, that some pill or potion can help "burn calories while you sleep." But a recent study reports that this may, in fact, be possible — simply by eating more lean protein.

Dutch researchers have reported for the first time that consuming nearly a third of one's daily calories as lean protein — for example, lean meats or poultry without the skin — revs up a person's metabolism during sleep. And the benefits aren't just nocturnal. The researchers also found that higher protein intake boosted the burning of calories and fat during the day.

Plus, when the study's participants, who were all women of healthy weight, ate more protein, they said they felt fuller, more satisfied and less hungry than when they consumed a diet with the typical amount of protein, about 10% of calories.

The findings suggest that adding lean protein to your daily fare "enables you to reach the same level of satiety that you are used to with about 80% of your normal energy intake," notes the study's lead author, Margriet Westerterp-Plantenga, an associate professor of human biology at the University of Maastricht, the Netherlands. "That means you can eat about 20% less and still have the same satiety…. It's a very easy way to ingest" fewer calories without feeling hungry all the time.

This is not the first study to reveal protein's satiating effects. The same research team found similar results in 1999, but during waking hours. A number of other researchers also report evidence of protein's satiating and calorie-burning properties.

What gives protein its caloric edge? It's more difficult for the body to metabolize protein than fat or carbohydrates.

The body also doesn't store protein as efficiently as it does carbohydrates or fat. So protein is more likely to be burned, a process called thermogenesis. That in turn requires more oxygen and helps you feel satisfied in the hours after eating, Westerterp-Plantenga says.

But the latest findings don't mean it's time to dust off those high-protein, low-carb diet books. The protein-heavy Atkins diet included high fat and in some phases eliminated most fruit and vegetables.

The current study limited fat to about 30% of daily calories, and included 40% of calories as healthy carbohydrates, including fruit and vegetables.

For example, lunch included bread, soy milk, fruit yogurt, tuna in water, tomatoes, cucumbers, feta cheese and salad dressing.

"You can have as much fruit and vegetables as you would like," Westerterp-Plantenga says. "But not too much vinaigrette, since that would add too much fat."

She also notes another important caveat. Current recommendations are to keep protein calories at 25% of total intake; this study used a healthy group of participants to test the effects of a higher level of protein.

If you have diabetes, altered glucose metabolism or kidney problems, don't add protein to your diet without consulting your doctor, Westerterp-Plantenga advises.

That said, here are some ways to add more protein:

• Pick your favorites. Skinless chicken breasts, turkey and Cornish hens without the skin, fish, lean meat, beans and nonfat dairy products all count as lean protein. Eat the ones you like best. The research team first tested participants' taste preferences and then designed menus that contained only foods they enjoyed eating.

• Think outside the cereal box. The study's high-protein breakfast consisted of skim milk, a skinless chicken breast, a slice of whole grain bread, butter and a meringue — a sweet crunchy cookie that also contains protein from egg whites. If that's not your idea of an appealing breakfast, other lean breakfast options include nonfat yogurt, eggs (or egg whites and egg substitutes for those who must limit cholesterol), soy-based meat substitutes and a few high-protein ready-to-eat cereals. Boost protein in oatmeal by making it with skim milk instead of water and adding some nonfat powdered milk.

• Aim for 94 grams. If you want 25% of your 1,500-calorie diet to come from protein, that's how much you'd need to eat every day. Reaching 94 grams could include: a salmon fillet, three cups of skim milk and a skinless chicken breast. On a 2,000-calorie diet, you'll need to eat 125 grams of protein.

http://www.newsday.com/news/health/ny-hsprot0226,0,6085542.story?track=rss

Rosebud
Sun, Feb-26-06, 20:54
The protein-heavy Atkins diet included high fat and in some phases eliminated most fruit and vegetables.
Once again, a writer who knows precious little about Atkins. :rolleyes:

How much better a study it would have been had they compared people on "their" diet with an equal number of people following Atkins as written. I guess that's asking too much.

We already know that the low fat approach does more harm than good. *shrug*

Rosebud:rose:

ReginaW
Mon, Feb-27-06, 07:40
I wrote about this column when it was first published Feb 7th in the Washington Post - boy oh boy do I hate how Squires doesn't "get it" and how nutritionally bankrupt her suggestions are! I even used the survey from this forum as an example!

Dietary Protein = Satiety

Imagine my intrigue this morning as I started reading Sally Squires weekly column, The Lean Plate Club, in the Washington Post and saw that it included the work of Dr. Margriet Westerterp-Plantenga, an associate professor of human biology at the University of Maastricht in the Netherlands.

Ms. Squires article, Finding Satisfaction In Protein, is an interesting read - I'll explain why in a moment. So you understand why I was enticed by Squires choice of subject today - Dr. Westerterp-Plantenga was among the poster presenters at the 2006 NMS Scientific Sessions last month and I had an opportunity to discuss her findings with her during the meeting.

Where Ms. Squires got it right - the research data supports a mountain of other evidence that shows protein offers three benefits:

greater satiety when eaten in a higher quantity than currently recommended
less efficiency with more thermogenesis in the metabolic processes for digestion
a boost to the metabolism to burn more calories each day
In the study, researchers report for the first time that consuming nearly a third of daily calories as lean protein, such as lean meat or poultry without the skin, revs a person's metabolism during sleep. And the benefits aren't just nocturnal: The researchers also found that higher protein intake boosted the burning of calories and fat during the day.

Plus, when the study's participants, who were all women of healthy weight, ate more protein, they said they felt fuller, more satisfied and less hungry than when they consumed a diet with the typical amount of protein, about 10 percent of calories.

The findings suggest that increasing lean protein daily "enables you to reach the same level of satiety that you are used to with about 80 percent of your normal energy intake," notes the study's lead author, Margriet Westerterp-Plantenga..."That means you can eat about 20 percent less and still have the same satiety. . . . It's a very easy way to ingest" fewer calories and without feeling hungry all the time.

[...]

What gives protein its caloric edge? The amino acids that comprise protein are more difficult for the body to metabolize than either fat or carbohydrates. So it takes more energy to burn protein than other nutrients. The body also doesn't store protein as efficiently as it does carbohydrates or fat. So it's more likely to be burned, a process called thermogenesis. That in turn requires more oxygen and increases the feeling of fullness and satisfaction after eating.

So then, where did Squires get it wrong?

Well, for one thing she's remains convinced that weight loss requires severe restriction of calories, with a recommendation of just 1500-calories each day. For most men and women, this level of calorie restriction is counter-productive and will not lead to long-term weight loss. I've written about why reducing calories too much doesn't work recently in Getting the Calorie Intake Right for Weight Loss.

For another, she mistakenly thinks that Westerterp-Plantenga's findings can automatically be interpreted and utilized for weight loss. If you read the abstract, this was a feeding study, in a carefully controlled environment, designed with "isocaloric" energy intake - those participating were fed enough calories to maintain their calorie intake to maintain weight. It was also a 4-day study.

Now don't get me wrong here - there is ample evidence to support a higher protein intake (as percentage of calories) as part of a diet to lose weight. Ms. Squires just fails to mention this study was not designed to investigate weight loss related to protein intake. Not only that, she takes it a step further and tries to convince her readers that "...the latest findings don't mean it's time to dust off those high-protein, low-carb diet books. The protein-heavy Atkins diet included high fat and in some phases eliminated most fruit and vegetables. The current study limited fat to about 30 percent of daily calories, and included 40 percent of calories as healthy carbohydrates, including fruit and vegetables."

This is simply ignorant of the piles of evidence we have that supports diets low in carbohydrate for weight loss. But, what can you expect from someone so committed to the idea that fat makes you fat?

She does try though. And she even offers up suggestions to lose weight in this column - eat just 1,500 calories a day and eat 94g of protein to do so with a salmon fillet, 3-cups of skim milk and a skinless chicken breast as part of your daily food intake. Here's what she doesn't bother to tell you - even if you make the best choices for your other foods, you're still not going to meet or exceed your Recommended Daily Allowance (RDA) for essential nutrients.

In fact, you'll fail to eat enough to satisfy your essential fatty acid requirement and your requirements for fat soluble vitamins D & E, along with potassium, fiber and iron. And that's IF you make the absolute best choices - if you don't you'll miss even more essential nutrients.

So what's a better approach? How about one that not only satisfies your hunger, but also is rich with nutrients?

While Ms. Squires is quick to dismiss low carbohydrate diets in the mistaken assumption that they eliminate fruits and vegetables, keep in mind the facts - all low carbohydrate diets REQUIRE a minimum intake of fruits and vegetables that exceeds current dietary recommendations for that food group! Odds are good that if you choose a low carbohydrate diet as your weight loss strategy, you'll actually increase the number of fruits and vegetables you eat each day rather than reduce that number!

This was the finding of a recent survey conducted by researchers at SUNY Downstate Medical Center with participants from the Active Low-Carbers Forum as the study group. Of those completing the survey - over 3,000 individuals actively following a carbohydrate restricted diet - only 4.77% increased fat intake, another 10.23% reported increasing protein and 11.99% reported eating vegetables was an important part of their low-carb approach.

In fact, when getting into specifics, 80.34% reported increasing vegetable intake with 46.22% reporting they increased intake to at least double their usual consumpsion compared with a pre-low-carb diet.

Did fat intake increase? Probably when we consider that the vast majority reported they were following Atkins.

Did this hinder weight loss?

You decide...

62.38% reported losing more than 30-pounds
14.33% reported they didn't need to lose more than 30-pounds
of those with 30-pounds or more to lose, that lost 30-pounds or more, 64.98% reported keeping the weight off for more than one-year
60.13% had their cholesterol measured before starting a low-carb diet
62.15% reported their total cholesterol decreased
57.96% reported their LDL decreased
48.57% reported their HDL increased
68.12% reported their triglyerides decreased
The last telling statistic is that 48.95% consulted with their physician before starting - with 55.77% reporting that their physician was supportive and other 28.28% reporting that their physician didn't have an opinion when they started but was encouraged after seeing the results!

Need I say more?

Angeline
Mon, Feb-27-06, 08:17
Hey Regina, nice to see you posting here. I read your blog everyday, very interesting stuff!

foxgluvs
Mon, Feb-27-06, 08:24
The protein-heavy Atkins diet included high fat and in some phases eliminated most fruit and vegetables.

Yes but this is actually true....certainly in the first phase (which people often stay in for far too long) it does eliminate most fruit and veg - so what was your point there Rose?

foxgluvs
Mon, Feb-27-06, 08:28
Just wanted to add that I don't agree or disagree with the original post.....just curious to see someone slating another point of view which isn't Atkins supporting yet again.

Dodger
Mon, Feb-27-06, 08:45
Ms. Squires is alway good for a chuckle. limited fat to about 30 percent of daily calories, and included 40 percent of calories as healthy carbohydrates, including fruit and vegetablesThis gives the 40% carbohydrates, 30% protein, 30% fat that is the Zone Diet.
So protein is more likely to be burned, a process called thermogenesisThe body generates heat through thermogenesis, fat is a great fuel for thermogenesis. Protein is less efficient as a fuel and is normally used for tissue growth and repair.

Regina,

Great commentary! Thanks for pointing out that the srudy was only four days and was isocoloric, not something to base a weight-loss regime on.

ItsTheWooo
Mon, Feb-27-06, 12:27
What upsets me about all of this is the assumption that eating protein helps only because it makes you eat less.

This is false on two accounts. First of all, in the context of a metabolically balanced state (i.e. you're not on carbs), I do not find protein to be all that satiating. Fat is much more "extraordinarily satiating" than protein. Of course, like I said, this is assuming we are talking about a metabolically balanced state - when carbs come into the picture then yes, protein is relatively more satiating.

The second account is that eating protein helps mainly because it encourages anabolic activity, not because you eat less. It makes your body want to build tissues and use fat.
I know this for a fact because when I binge on meat, even if I feel myself getting hungrier and eating more and less sugar stable (which sometimes does happen when I eat a lot of lean meat)... I only feel leaner the next morning. It never, ever fails. If I binge on chicken, the next morning I feel dehydrated, lean, and less fatty. It's like I ate very little food, only better, because I feel leaner (whereas with under eating I typically just feel "smaller" but not leaner).

The secret to my successful LC diet is fat and protein in appropriate proportions. If I were to eat only protein I would never feel satisfied and my sugar would not be as stable; I need the fat for that. But if I ate very high fat and low protein like some people do I know my metabolism wouldn't be as high as it would with more protein. Carbs? Just enough to prevent low energy and to avoid doldrums in diet, but not so much that I have problems.

LC FP
Mon, Feb-27-06, 13:24
First of all, in the context of a metabolically balanced state (i.e. you're not on carbs), I do not find protein to be all that satiating. Fat is much more "extraordinarily satiating"

I can agree with this, too. After my weight-loss phase if I eat a rather large portion of steak I can still feel hungry, but a couple fatty burgers (probably half the volume of the steak) fills me up.

Lisa N
Mon, Feb-27-06, 14:26
Yes but this is actually true....certainly in the first phase (which people often stay in for far too long) it does eliminate most fruit and veg - so what was your point there Rose?

Define 'most'?

Even during induction (http://www.atkins.com/articles/atkins-phases/phase-one/acceptable-foods/), the strictest of all the phases of the Atkins plan, a greater variety of veggies and non-sweet fruits are allowed than most people have ever eaten in their lives; 58 kinds to be exact (and I'm sure more could be found that are low enough in carbs that aren't on that list) and in quantities that exceed current recommendations (3 cups = 6 servings). Add to that the 1/2 avocado and olives also permitted in addition to the veggies and you've just added 2 servings of fruit as well. ;)