PDA

View Full Version : New obesity pill...


Welcome to the Active Low-Carber Forums

Support for Atkins diet, Protein Power, Neanderthin (Paleo Diet), CAD/CALP, Dr. Bernstein Diabetes Solution and any other healthy low-carb diet or plan, all are welcome in our lowcarb community. Forget starvation and fad diets -- join the healthy eating crowd! You may register by clicking here, it's free!



Rosebud
Sat, Dec-24-05, 15:27
http://www.smh.com.au/news/world/a-pill-to-shrink-the-masses/2005/12/23/1135032186820.html

A pill to shrink the masses

December 24, 2005

One company stands to make billions from a drug that could reduce obesity, writes Diane Martindale.

IT STARTED with a joint. Back in the 1960s, psychologists studying the effects of cannabis on short-term memory noticed the subjects couldn't keep their hands off the free marshmallows. What the researchers were seeing was confirmation of a well-known side effect of smoking cannabis - intense hunger pangs known as the munchies.

Fast-forward 40 years, and scientists are talking about the munchies again, albeit in a different way. Early next year, the French pharmaceutical company Sanofi-Aventis will start selling a drug designed to induce the "anti-munchies". Rimonabant taps into the same brain circuits as cannabis, but instead of turning them on, it turns them off. If what has been made public from the clinical trials is anything to go by, Rimonabant has almost miraculous powers, helping people to control their appetites and banish many of the metabolic problems associated with being too fat.

And that's not all. Rimonabant could possibly be a quit-smoking aid and might even be useful in treating alcoholism and other addictions. No wonder many industry analysts are backing it to become the first blockbuster drug of the 21st century.

But some are yet to be convinced. They agree that the available results look promising, but point out that there has been only one peer-reviewed article from the clinical trials. And although the drug's reported side effects are minor, nothing is known about potential long-term effects.

In 1988, researchers at the St Louis University School of Medicine in Missouri discovered the active ingredient of cannabis exerts its effects by binding to specific receptors in the brain. These cannabinoid receptors, or CB1s, turned out to be part of a network throughout the brain and body whose main role is to damp down the activity of other signalling systems.

Researchers have discovered that this "endocannabinoid" system is involved in all kinds of functions, including memory, nausea, pain, reproduction and immunity. It also plays a part in appetite and fat storage.

The details are unclear, but animal studies suggest that cannabis-like molecules produced in the body bind to CB1 receptors on neurons in the hypothalamus, the brain's main control centre for food intake. In doing so, the molecules inhibit other signals that tell us not to eat, and make us feel hungry. Rimonabant blocks CB1 receptors, which appears to reduce the hunger.

In the 1990s, Sanofi-Avenist - then Sanofi-Synthelabo - recruited 6600 overweight or obese people into four clinical trials to test Rimonabant and another 6500 volunteers in smoking cessation trials. All four obesity trials are complete. Sanofi-Avenist has published only one set of results, in the April 16 issue this year of The Lancet, from the halfway point of a two-year European study of 1507 volunteers.

All the volunteers were put on a calorie-restricted diet and an exercise program, plus a daily dose of either a placebo or a low or high dose (5 or 20 milligrams) of Rimonabant. Those on the placebo shed an average of 1.8 kilograms and saw their waists shrink by 2.4 centimetres. But those on a high dose of Rimonabant lost an average of 6.6 kilograms and reduced their waist size by 6.5 centimetres. More than two-thirds of this group had lost 5 per cent or more of their body weight.

And there was a big drop in the proportion who had "metabolic syndrome" - a cluster of symptoms associated with obesity, including lipid imbalance, high blood pressure and insulin resistance, which can lead to heart disease and diabetes. The number with the syndrome fell from about 42 per cent to 20 per cent in the high-dose group, compared with a fall from 40 to 31 per cent in the placebo group.

The researchers who analysed the results, led by Luc Van Gaal of Antwerp University Hospital in Belgium, found the improvements in metabolic benefit were better than could be expected from the weight loss alone.

As for the smoking cessation trials, so far the company has only released the results of a 10-week trial involving 787 people, but these look promising.

Sanofi-Aventis submitted its results to the US Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency earlier this year. If it gets the go-ahead, Rimonabant will sell as Acomplia. The investment bank JP Morgan predicts sales will reach 5 billion a year by 2010.

Curiously, however, Sanofi-Aventis does not intend to market Rimonabant for weight loss or smoking cessation, preferring to cast it as a heart medication on the back of the cardiovascular benefits of curbing metabolic syndrome and giving up cigarettes. This could make good business sense, since US health insurance companies rarely pay for anti-obesity drugs but will cover cardiovascular medication. And the regulatory agencies tend to be extra critical of weight-loss medications.

New Scientist

Dodger
Sat, Dec-24-05, 18:00
Curiously, however, Sanofi-Aventis does not intend to market Rimonabant for weight loss or smoking cessation, preferring to cast it as a heart medication on the back of the cardiovascular benefits of curbing metabolic syndrome and giving up cigarettes. This could make good business sense, since US health insurance companies rarely pay for anti-obesity drugs but will cover cardiovascular medication. And the regulatory agencies tend to be extra critical of weight-loss medications.I would have thought that the regulatory agencies would have been more critical of heart drugs than obesity drugs. Their laxness on heart drugs may explain the numerous statins that they have approved,

CindySue48
Sat, Dec-24-05, 19:27
I would have thought that the regulatory agencies would have been more critical of heart drugs than obesity drugs.I'd expect them to be equally critical of ALL drugs!

LilithD
Sun, Dec-25-05, 00:20
"All the volunteers were put on a calorie-restricted diet and an exercise program, plus a daily dose of either a placebo or a low or high dose (5 or 20 milligrams) of Rimonabant. Those on the placebo shed an average of 1.8 kilograms and saw their waists shrink by 2.4 centimetres. But those on a high dose of Rimonabant lost an average of 6.6 kilograms and reduced their waist size by 6.5 centimetres. More than two-thirds of this group had lost 5 per cent or more of their body weight."

But they were all on the same calories and exercise? So it had nothing to do with controlling appetite, but somehow increased the effectiveness of calorie restriction and exercise? Or they were all allowed 1500 calories, but those on the drug only ate 1200 of them? Not at all clear...

LC FP
Sun, Dec-25-05, 12:31
The studies were pretty well done (at least the published studies). There was RIO-North America and RIO-Europe. Rimonabant 20 mg led to a 20 lb sustained weight loss, as long as the drug was continued, up to 2 years so far. If the drug was stopped, weight slowly reaccumulated over about a one-year period back to original weight. So it's perfect, from Sanofi's point of view. You have to take it forever.

It also led to about a 50% quit-smoking rate, which I think is actually pretty remarkable. No other quit smoking aid (nicotine gum, Wellbutrin) does better than about a 15% quit rate. I don't think you need to stay on the med if you're able to quit smoking for some period of time. I believe this effect may be the real benefit of this drug, if it holds up.

It blocks the marijuana receptor in your brain, and seems to cut food (?sugar) addiction -- munchies--, and smoking addiction. It may have some effect in blocking all addictions. If this is true, it really could be a very useful drug (I can't believe I'm typing that, as I'm not that big of a drug proponent, at least not anymore!)

When rimonabant was developed, Sanofi, a little French company, suddenly became very very rich, and they bought Aventis, a huge worldwide drug company, just to get their distribution network. This drug may make lipitor ($11 billion per year) look like a piker in a few years.

Side effects? Who knows? There was some concern that it may cause depression but I don't believe that was a huge problem in the studies so far. No doubt something will turn up. There are no perfect meds out there.

This drug actually might do our cause a LOT of good.

As mentioned above, they are going to market it as a cardiovascular drug. They are going to promote it as an ANTI-METABOLIC SYNDROME drug.

Having a huge drug company out there marketing the evils of the metabolic syndrome to the great unwashed public will do a million times more than Atkins, Feinman, Eades, Clinton, Jennifer Aniston, Barry Sears, Dodger (sorry, just a joke), or even the redoubtable Tony Colpo put together could ever do.

Once metabolic syndrome is established as worse than UBL, our message that carbs cause the metabolic syndrome may mean something understandable to the average person and the average doctor.

No doubt Sanofi will downplay the nutritional aspects of treating metabolic syndrome, but we now have plenty of "scientific" evidence in place that nutrition works. We have to keep hammering that home, especially now, before the marketing blitz begins, so we don't look like we're just piling on a hot idea.

This is what I was thinking about when I read Dr. Feinman's and Volek's Nutrition and Metabolism article about carbs and metabolic syndrome. Especially when they stated that the metabolic syndrome could be defined as the body's response to carb overconsumption. That was brilliant, I think.

Some on this board joked about Feinman and Volek "discovering" the obvious. But, hey, that's the way this game is played. If you can do it better, please go ahead.

bsheets
Sun, Dec-25-05, 19:54
"All the volunteers were put on a calorie-restricted diet and an exercise program, plus a daily dose of either a placebo or a low or high dose (5 or 20 milligrams) of Rimonabant. Those on the placebo shed an average of 1.8 kilograms and saw their waists shrink by 2.4 centimetres. But those on a high dose of Rimonabant lost an average of 6.6 kilograms and reduced their waist size by 6.5 centimetres. More than two-thirds of this group had lost 5 per cent or more of their body weight."

But they were all on the same calories and exercise? So it had nothing to do with controlling appetite, but somehow increased the effectiveness of calorie restriction and exercise? Or they were all allowed 1500 calories, but those on the drug only ate 1200 of them? Not at all clear...
You know, I didn't even spot that one. Well done! Very good point!


e

Dodger
Sun, Dec-25-05, 21:39
Having a huge drug company out there marketing the evils of the metabolic syndrome to the great unwashed public will do a million times more than Atkins, Feinman, Eades, Clinton, Jennifer Aniston, Barry Sears, Dodger (sorry, just a joke), or even the redoubtable Tony Colpo put together could ever do.
You've made my day. Jennifer Aniston and I are finally linked together.

Absinthe62
Mon, Dec-26-05, 06:11
But have we learned nothing in the past decade or so? Sure, diet pills work while you're taking them, but what happens if you don't follow "a calorie-restricted diet and exercise program?" What happens when you stop taking the drug?
And will this one go the way of others when they discover the long-term side effects are far more damaging than the extra weight ever could be?

I don't trust pharmaceutical companies any further than I can spit, because first and foremost they are in it for profit. Any "help" they provide the public is secondary.

Zuleikaa
Mon, Dec-26-05, 08:09
And will this one go the way of others when they discover the long-term side effects are far more damaging than the extra weight ever could be?

I don't trust pharmaceutical companies any further than I can spit, because first and foremost they are in it for profit. Any "help" they provide the public is secondary.Amen!!! Amen!!! Amen!!!