PDA

View Full Version : Better food allergen labeling incoming?


Welcome to the Active Low-Carber Forums

Support for Atkins diet, Protein Power, Neanderthin (Paleo Diet), CAD/CALP, Dr. Bernstein Diabetes Solution and any other healthy low-carb diet or plan, all are welcome in our lowcarb community. Forget starvation and fad diets -- join the healthy eating crowd! You may register by clicking here, it's free!



Nancy LC
Tue, Dec-20-05, 16:45
Sounds like it might be good (better) news for those of us trying to avoid allergens:

Hope they really go after the stuff containing hidden amounts of gluten in things like "modified food starch", "caramel coloring", "natural flavors".

http://abcnews.go.com/Health/wireStory?id=1425705&CMP=OTC-RSSFeeds0312

The Associated Press

WASHINGTON Dec 20, 2005 — Food labels will soon have to disclose in plain language whether the products contain peanuts, shellfish, eggs or other ingredients that could sicken people with food allergies.

A federal law that takes effect Jan. 1 requires food labels to list ingredients made from proteins derived from any of the eight major allergenic foods: milk, eggs, fish, crustaceans, wheat, tree nuts, soybeans and peanuts. The Food and Drug Administration says they account for 90 percent of all food allergies.

The 2004 Food Allergen Labeling and Consumer Protection Act was sparked by fears that many food labels either didn't include the allergens in their listed ingredients or listed them using names not easily recognizable by consumers.

A 1999 FDA study in Minnesota and Wisconsin found a quarter of the baked goods, ice cream and candy its scientists sampled failed to list peanuts or eggs as ingredients.

Food labels must now list the common name of the product as well as the name of the specific allergen it contains. A product containing a protein derived from milk called casein, for example, must list both "milk" and "casein" on its label. Labels also must specify the type of fish, crustacean or tree nut the product contains.

The FDA estimates 2 percent of adults and 5 percent of young children suffer from food allergies. Each year, about 30,000 people require emergency room treatment for food allergies and an estimated 150 die.

CindySue48
Tue, Dec-20-05, 18:53
Maybe now we'll really see just how much soy is out there! As one who's allergic (intestinal problems) I'm very careful about reading labels.

BBQgal
Tue, Dec-20-05, 19:03
hi
I am so glad this is happening. It will make things so much easier for me and i will spend less time in the emergency room.

Annie

LilithD
Wed, Dec-21-05, 13:43
Hmm, I suspect that those of us who have become used to eating almost only whole, fresh foods, we're not going to often bother to go back to the effort of label-analysis just for some expensive packaged foods...

gryfonclaw
Wed, Dec-21-05, 15:30
One wonders how much information a manufacter can fit on a label....

Nancy LC
Wed, Dec-21-05, 16:02
Some manufacturers are already stating things like:

Contains: soy, wheat, egg

Love that!

CindySue48
Wed, Dec-21-05, 19:15
Some manufacturers are already stating things like:

Contains: soy, wheat, egg

Love that!yes, but it's when they say "vegetable oil" that I run the other way! Here in the states, manufacturers have been able to label the ingredient as "vegetable oil", when mostly it contains soy....or corn oil.

Nancy LC
Wed, Dec-21-05, 19:38
If they have to identify soy I'd think they will have to identify that now (or soon). Sure hope so! So vegetable should be ok, as long as it doesn't also say soy, once this new regulation is in place.

Dodger
Wed, Dec-21-05, 19:39
yes, but it's when they say "vegetable oil" that I run the other way! Here in the states, manufacturers have been able to label the ingredient as "vegetable oil", when mostly it contains soy....or corn oil.I believe that the term 'vegetable oil' is grossly misused. I think of olive oil as a fruit oil because olives are a fruit, not a veggie. Corn is a grain and corn oil should be considered a grain oil, not a vegetable oil and soybean oil should be considered as a bean oil, not vegetable. Now broccoli oil would be a true vegetable oil, although I wonder how many tons on broccoli it takes to get a meaningful amount of oil!

CindySue48
Wed, Dec-21-05, 23:59
I believe that the term 'vegetable oil' is grossly misused. I think of olive oil as a fruit oil because olives are a fruit, not a veggie. Corn is a grain and corn oil should be considered a grain oil, not a vegetable oil and soybean oil should be considered as a bean oil, not vegetable. Now broccoli oil would be a true vegetable oil, although I wonder how many tons on broccoli it takes to get a meaningful amount of oil! :lol: I agree!!!