For Monty - Why are you homeless?

[Mr-Natural]

Monty, ... Monty, Monty!

Have you ever considered your public image?

You go around posting threads on smn like some kind of
homeless bum. :(

Anybody trying to sell a "message" without some kind of web
site which they use as their home-base has absolutely no
credibility, IMHO.

No name? No web site? No home-base? That makes you a
homeless bum.

You claim to have been posting here for 3 years, yet you are
still homeless. Please tell us why?

I have over 120 web pages written by moi, that I can refer
people to. Where is your credibility? Why should anybody give
a homeless bum like you, the time of day? Please tell us, so
that we can better understand your mental illness.

Just thought that you might want to know.

[Montygram]

There is no need for a "web site." It's all on pubmed.com and
in the relevant literature that has not yet been placed on
pubmed. I am merely here to explain things in less technical
language. Now for someone like yourself, who is simply
committed to an ideology, there is little I can do.

[Mr-Natural]

If you keep on repeating it to yourself, long enough, you
might actually start believing your own madness.

Meanwhile the Western Price Foundation has been talking
about coconut oil a lot longer and better than you have or
ever will.

Bye, homeless person.

[Mr-Natural]

montygram wrote:

> There is no need for a "web site."

YES, there is!

> It's all on pubmed.com and in the relevant literature that
> has not yet been placed on PubMed.

The average person on these ngs, downloads new posts with
their Microsoft Outlook Express newsreader.

They are here precisely because they do NOT know how to
research information on the web. They don't that Google has
groups, let alone how to research old posts via Google groups.

Pubmed is so obscure and search engine is so arcane, that
probably less than 0.05 % of the public even knows that
Pubmed exists, let alone how to research information on it.
PubMed does take a bit getting used to. Google is a lot
easier to use.

> I am merely here to explain things in less technical
> language. Now for someone like yourself, who is simply
> committed to an ideology, there is little I can do.

Ha, ... Hah, Ha! Keep on dreaming. :(

The newsgroup post format basically sucks. And, you very
well know it.

You need a web page to cover any serious topic with anything
approaching high quality. You know: footnotes, references, and
hyperlinks to PubMed abstracts. The lifespan of Newsgroup
posts is about one week, if it is that long. You have to write
the same stuff over and over again. You answer a question on
these ngs, and 10 minutes later some Yahoo will ask the exact
same question precisely because they do not have a clue as to
what they are doing.

Just thought that you might want to know. :)

[Mr-Natural]

George Cherry wrote:
> "Mr-Natural-Health" <johngohde@naturalhealthperspective.com>
> wrote in message news:1134611992.207447.41120@g49g2000cwa.g-
> ooglegroups.com...
> > montygram wrote:
> >
> >> There is no need for a "web site."
> >
> > YES, there is!
> >
> >> It's all on pubmed.com and in the relevant literature
> >> that has not yet been placed on PubMed.
> >
> > The average person on these ngs, downloads new posts with
> > their Microsoft Outlook Express newsreader.
> >
> > They are here precisely because they do NOT know how to
> > research information on the web. They don't that Google
> > has groups, let alone how to research old posts via Google
> > groups.
> >
> > Pubmed is so obscure and search engine is so arcane, that
> > probably less than 0.05 % of the public even knows that
> > Pubmed exists, let alone how to research information on
> > it. PubMed does take a bit getting used to. Google is a
> > lot easier to use.
> >
> >> I am merely here to explain things in less technical
> >> language. Now for someone like yourself, who is simply
> >> committed to an ideology, there is little I can do.
> >
> > Ha, ... Hah, Ha! Keep on dreaming. :(
> >
> > The newsgroup post format basically sucks. And, you very
> > well know it.
> >
> > You need a web page to cover any serious topic with
> > anything approaching high quality. You know: footnotes,
> > references, and hyperlinks to PubMed abstracts. The
> > lifespan of Newsgroup posts is about one week, if it is
> > that long. You have to write the same stuff over and over
> > again. You answer a question on these ngs, and 10 minutes
> > later some Yahoo will ask the exact same question
> > precisely because they do not have a clue as to what they
> > are doing.
> >
> > Just thought that you might want to know. :)
>
> If he had a site, who would go there?

Ha, ... Hah, Ha!

Every webmaster has an equal opportunity to fail.

And, most do. Or, give up. :(

[George Che]

"Mr-Natural-Health" <johngohde@naturalhealthperspective.com>
wrote in message
news:1134611992.207447.41120@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> montygram wrote:
>
>> There is no need for a "web site."
>
> YES, there is!
>
>> It's all on pubmed.com and in the relevant literature that
>> has not yet been placed on PubMed.
>
> The average person on these ngs, downloads new posts with
> their Microsoft Outlook Express newsreader.
>
> They are here precisely because they do NOT know how to
> research information on the web. They don't that Google
> has groups, let alone how to research old posts via
> Google groups.
>
> Pubmed is so obscure and search engine is so arcane, that
> probably less than 0.05 % of the public even knows that
> Pubmed exists, let alone how to research information on it.
> PubMed does take a bit getting used to. Google is a lot
> easier to use.
>
>> I am merely here to explain things in less technical
>> language. Now for someone like yourself, who is simply
>> committed to an ideology, there is little I can do.
>
> Ha, ... Hah, Ha! Keep on dreaming. :(
>
> The newsgroup post format basically sucks. And, you very
> well know it.
>
> You need a web page to cover any serious topic with anything
> approaching high quality. You know: footnotes, references,
> and hyperlinks to PubMed abstracts. The lifespan of
> Newsgroup posts is about one week, if it is that long. You
> have to write the same stuff over and over again. You answer
> a question on these ngs, and 10 minutes later some Yahoo
> will ask the exact same question precisely because they do
> not have a clue as to what they are doing.
>
> Just thought that you might want to know. :)

If he had a site, who would go there?