Natural Medicine Wiki

[Dan Nedelk]

Hi All,

I've been working for months on building a Wik devoted to
natural medicine. Please help me out and participate. Together
we can build the world's largest encyclopedia of accurate
Naturopathic Medicine!

http://www.naturopath.ws

Once this get built we will work on the vertical search
engine which will index and consolidate the same materials
and subjects!

Best Regards, Dan Nedelko Webmaster http://www.naturopath.ws

[outsor]

Will information to the contrary be accepted? If not why not?
It would seem the world's most complete source would by
definition include the full spectrum of views, research or
lack thereof, etc. that all sources might offer.

"I've been working for months on building a Wik devoted to
natural medicine. Please help me out and participate. Together
we can build the world's largest encyclopedia of accurate
Naturopathic Medicine!"

[mail4ernst]

outsor@citynet.net wrote:
> Will information to the contrary be accepted? If not why
> not? It would seem the world's most complete source would by
> definition include the full spectrum of views, research or
> lack thereof, etc. that all sources might offer.
>

Good point. Edits and contributions to the existing Wikipedia
must conform to the "views" of the "higher-up"
administrators, which consist of a self-righteous club that
dictates which edits or contributions stay, and which one's
get kicked out. All that "free-for-all" editing sounds great
until you check out the final decision-making editors (and
their agendas), that have the ultimate say, and you see
ultimate bias in action.
::E::

[Mr-Natural]

mail4ernstlich@yahoo.com wrote:

> Good point. Edits and contributions to the existing
> Wikipedia must conform to the "views" of the "higher-up"
> administrators, which consist of a self-righteous club that
> dictates which edits or contributions stay, and which one's
> get kicked out. All that "free-for-all" editing sounds great
> until you check out the final decision-making editors (and
> their agendas), that have the ultimate say, and you see
> ultimate bias in action.

Let us not forget that the founder of Wikipedia, Jimbo
'the Bimbo' is in the SEX business selling XXX rated
pictures on the web.

Once you have figured out that little detail, what do you
expect from an organization run by slime?

Academia has been against Wikipedia from the very beginning. I
have documented this on my user page.

Just thought that you might want to know. And, if you don't, I
don't care. Ha, ... Hah, Ha!

[outsor]

"Let us not forget that the founder of Wikipedia, Jimbo
'the Bimbo' is in the SEX business selling XXX rated
pictures on the web.

Once you have figured out that little detail, what do you
expect from an organization run by slime?

Academia has been against Wikipedia from the very beginning. I
have documented this on my user page."

Mr natural health stands in the perfect moral place to pass
judgement on others, naturally. Mr. "natural health" just
being a natural bigot recently posted the below, naturally:

"I love to watch a bunch of scientist want-a-bees make fools
out of themselves by parading around like a bunch of niggers
living in New Orleans."

"Sounds like something the nigger would say to the white lady
that he was raping in the Astro Dome.

The more slime is offended, the better I like it."

[Mr-Natural]

outsor@citynet.net wrote:

> "Let us not forget that the founder of Wikipedia, Jimbo 'the
> Bimbo' is in the SEX business selling XXX rated pictures on
> the web.

> Mr natural health stands in the perfect moral place to pass
> judgement on others, naturally. Mr. "natural health" just
> being a natural bigot recently posted the below, naturally:

What? You never let facts stand in you way, Jimbo?

Jimbo is in the SEX business. I am NOT.

[outsor]

"What? You never let facts stand in you way, Jimbo?

Jimbo is in the SEX business. I am NOT."

You might have a point, a bigot and a pornographer might be at
a better place to judge each other.