PDA

View Full Version : Mad Cows and Madder Humans


Welcome to the Active Low-Carber Forums

Support for Atkins diet, Protein Power, Neanderthin (Paleo Diet), CAD/CALP, Dr. Bernstein Diabetes Solution and any other healthy low-carb diet or plan, all are welcome in our lowcarb community. Forget starvation and fad diets -- join the healthy eating crowd! You may register by clicking here, it's free!



banmilk
Wed, Jul-06-05, 17:27
From: "Robert Cohen" <notmilk@...> Date: Thu Jun 30, 2005
10:56 am Subject: Latest Mad Cow & Mad Human News notmilk2002
Offline Send Email

Latest Mad Cow & Mad Human Disease News

In November of 2004, I wrote a series of columns regarding
USDA's Second Mad Cow Disease coverup. USDA denied, as I
provided evidence that they lied. This last week of June,
2005, USDA has admitted that they lied. So what else is new?
As a result of USDA's clever brainwashing, Americans no
longer give a damn. At the conclusion of this column, I'll
include my astounding November, 2004 column. Meanwhile...back
at the farm...

When the subject is Mad Cow Disease, consumers no longer
give a damn.

The day after America's second Mad Cow was confirmed, cattle
futures soared 70 cents per pound on strong trading.
Cattlemen now know that meat-eaters don't really care about
Mad Cow Disease.

What's next?

A new test for Mad Cow Disese has been developed by Vacci-Test
Corporation. The new test requires just one drop of blood from
a suspected cow. That assay will determine whether the suspect
animal has a neurological disorder. The test will cost about
$20 per cow, which should add about two cents to a
meat-eater's next burger.

Coming Soon: A test for Mad Human Disease?
____________________________________
My Mad Cow Column of November 20, 2004
____________________________________

USDA Mad Cow Coverup Unravels

I now realize that there may never again be a confirmed case
of Mad Cow Disease during the George Bush Administration. Oh,
the diseased animals are out there, but in the name of
homeland security, we are being "protected" in this
Orwell-like twenty first century by rulers who think we need
sheltering. We may never know the true reason that Ann Veneman
resigned her post as USDA's boss the day after the latest Mad
Cow incident began. Shortly before her (forced?) resignation,
she remarked that her intention was to serve through a second
term. Did she leave because she was ordered to fudge the Mad
Cow results? I've discovered new evidence that is quite
suggestive of a continuing coverup. You be the judge, as I
reveal disturbing new information in this column.

The problem with lying, is that many lies have to be told to
cover up the original lie, so that the liar often forgets to
protect the original lie.

Records show that after USDA concluded that the
pre-Thanksgiving cow was not a Mad Cow, they then began to
test an unprecedented number of other cows. Had the test come
back negative, USDA would logically have gone back to previous
test levels. Instead, significantly more animals were tested.

During that ten week period prior to the discovery of
America's latest case of Mad Cow Disease, the United States
Department of Agriculture (USDA) examined the brains of 60,655
slaughtered creatures. That's an average of 6,066 per week.

During that one week period of discovery (11/15-11/21), USDA
tested 7,900 cows, an increase of 1,835 over the previous ten
week average. Such a dramatic increase makes sense, of course,
but what followed after USDA's "safe" conclusion contradicts
USDA's lie.

Once USDA fudged the results, I anxiously awaited the
following week's data. Was USDA telling the truth? If so, it
would have been logical to return to the previous test level
of 6,066 tested animals per week. If USDA officials were more
concerned than they let on, the test numbers would be close or
would exceed the key week's 7,900 level.

Here are the results.

During the Thanksgiving week of November 22-November 28, how
many cows were tested for Mad Cow Disease? Most of America
enjoyed two weekdays days off of work, plus a weekend. A
shortened four day work week had to have resulted in fewer
animals being tested, particularly after USDA's big lie. So,
from 11/22-11/28, just 5,878 animals were tested. If USDA had
been telling the truth, the following week's testing would
have reverted to the running 6,000 average or lower. If USDA
had fudged the test data, the following week's data would have
jumped through the roof. So I waited. And watched.

Here's the surprise. Last week, from 11/29 through
12/3, USDA tested 9,110 animals. See their test history:

<http://www.aphis.usda.gov/lpa/issues/bse_testing/test_resu-
lts.html >

Tiny URL: <http://tinyurl.com/5f2qu >

The numbers do not lie. They expose USDA's lie. Over 9,000
cows were tested last week by concerned USDA regulators. An
increase of fifty-five percent! Had there been no mad cow, the
numbers would have been much lower, not 55% higher. More cows
were tested because the cow was positive for Mad Cow. USDA
lied to America to protect cattlemen.

Only USDA's Department of Enlightenment (Propaganda) lies. Mad
Cow is here, and in order to do damage control, insiders are
in a panic, testing more animals to prevent the coming plague.
Why test more animals? Because USDA confirmed that the
original animal tested positive. Had it not, USDA most
certainly would have returned to routine testing. They are now
in an accelerated testing mode for good reason. It's here...

Mad Cow Testing Timeline

During that ten week period prior to November 18th, 2004, USDA
tested 60,660 cows for Mad Cow Disease, or an average of 6,066
per week, or an average of 867 cows per day.
_________________________________________________
November 15, 2004-Oklahoma Cow suspected of Mad Cow Disease
November 16, 2004-USDA Secretary Ann Veneman Resigns November
17, 2004 November 18, 2004-USDA First announces positive Mad
Cow Test November 19, 2004 November 20, 2004**(X=1129 cows
tested each day this week) November 21, 2004
_________________________________________________
November 22, 2004 November 23, 2004-USDA Announces 7900 Cows
Tested 11/15-11/21 November 24, 2004-USDA Announces no Mad Cow
Disease November 25, 2004-Traditional Day Off Before
Thanksgiving November 26, 2004-Thanksgiving Day November 27,
2004 November 28, 2004**(X=839 cows tested each day this week)
_________________________________________________
November 29, 2004 November 30, 2004-USDA Announces 5878 Cows
Tested 11/22-11/28 December 01, 2004 December 02, 2004
December 03, 2004**(X=1301 cows tested each day this week)
December 04, 2004 December 05, 2004
_________________________________________________
December 06, 2004 December 07, 2004-USDA Announces 9110 Cows
Tested 11/29-12/5

Had the original cow tested negative, USDA would have shifted
their testing procedures into neutral, or into a lower gear.
Instead, they now have their accelerator to the floor in the
highest gear in their history. That's because they know the
truth, and it's panic time at USDA. Now that the truth be
known, do not expect future numbers to be true. They will
fudge their future results. This time atound they were caught
with their pants down. How can you be sure? Do not drink the
milk. Do not eat the meat.

Bottom line: After lying to America, USDA increased their
testing from 839 cows per day to 1301 cows per day, an
increase of 55%! Such an increase reflects extremely concerned
bureaucrats. The numbers do not lie. The lies come from the
dishonest bureaucrats in America's new elite who think that we
need protection from ourselves.

Robert Cohen http://www.notmilk.com

Phil Scott
Sat, Jul-09-05, 06:21
<banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1120683702.611673.34100@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> From: "Robert Cohen" <notmilk@...> Date: Thu Jun 30, 2005
> 10:56 am Subject: Latest Mad Cow & Mad Human News
> notmilk2002 Offline Send Email
>
> Latest Mad Cow & Mad Human Disease News
>
> In November of 2004, I wrote a series of columns regarding
> USDA's Second Mad Cow Disease coverup. USDA denied, as I
> provided evidence that they lied. This last week of June,
> 2005, USDA has admitted that they lied. So what else is new?
> As a result of USDA's clever brainwashing, Americans no
> longer give a damn. At the conclusion of this column, I'll
> include my astounding November, 2004 column.
> Meanwhile...back at the farm...
>
> When the subject is Mad Cow Disease, consumers no longer
> give a damn.
>
> The day after America's second Mad Cow was confirmed, cattle
> futures soared 70 cents per pound on strong trading.
> Cattlemen now know that meat-eaters don't really care about
> Mad Cow Disease.
>
> What's next?
>
> A new test for Mad Cow Disese has been developed by
> Vacci-Test Corporation. The new test requires just one drop
> of blood from a suspected cow. That assay will determine
> whether the suspect animal has a neurological disorder. The
> test will cost about $20 per cow, which should add about two
> cents to a meat-eater's next burger.
>
> Coming Soon: A test for Mad Human Disease?
> ____________________________________
> My Mad Cow Column of November 20, 2004
> ____________________________________
>
> USDA Mad Cow Coverup Unravels
>
> I now realize that there may never again be a confirmed
> case of Mad Cow Disease during the George Bush
> Administration. Oh, the diseased animals are out there, but
> in the name of homeland security, we are being "protected"
> in this Orwell-like twenty first century by rulers who
> think we need sheltering. We may never know the true reason
> that Ann Veneman resigned her post as USDA's boss the day
> after the latest Mad Cow incident began. Shortly before her
> (forced?) resignation, she remarked that her intention was
> to serve through a second term. Did she leave because she
> was ordered to fudge the Mad Cow results? I've discovered
> new evidence that is quite suggestive of a continuing
> coverup. You be the judge, as I reveal disturbing new
> information in this column.
>
> The problem with lying, is that many lies have to be told to
> cover up the original lie, so that the liar often forgets to
> protect the original lie.
>
> Records show that after USDA concluded that the
> pre-Thanksgiving cow was not a Mad Cow, they then began to
> test an unprecedented number of other cows. Had the test
> come back negative, USDA would logically have gone back to
> previous test levels. Instead, significantly more animals
> were tested.
>
> During that ten week period prior to the discovery of
> America's latest case of Mad Cow Disease, the United States
> Department of Agriculture (USDA) examined the brains of
> 60,655 slaughtered creatures. That's an average of 6,066
> per week.
>
> During that one week period of discovery (11/15-11/21), USDA
> tested 7,900 cows, an increase of 1,835 over the previous
> ten week average. Such a dramatic increase makes sense, of
> course, but what followed after USDA's "safe" conclusion
> contradicts USDA's lie.
>
> Once USDA fudged the results, I anxiously awaited the
> following week's data. Was USDA telling the truth? If so, it
> would have been logical to return to the previous test level
> of 6,066 tested animals per week. If USDA officials were
> more concerned than they let on, the test numbers would be
> close or would exceed the key week's 7,900 level.
>
> Here are the results.
>
> During the Thanksgiving week of November 22-November 28, how
> many cows were tested for Mad Cow Disease? Most of America
> enjoyed two weekdays days off of work, plus a weekend. A
> shortened four day work week had to have resulted in fewer
> animals being tested, particularly after USDA's big lie. So,
> from 11/22-11/28, just 5,878 animals were tested. If USDA
> had been telling the truth, the following week's testing
> would have reverted to the running 6,000 average or lower.
> If USDA had fudged the test data, the following week's data
> would have jumped through the roof. So I waited. And
> watched.
>
> Here's the surprise. Last week, from 11/29 through
> 12/3, USDA tested 9,110 animals. See their test history:
>
>
<http://www.aphis.usda.gov/lpa/issues/bse_testing/test_resul-
ts .html >
>
> Tiny URL: <http://tinyurl.com/5f2qu >
>
> The numbers do not lie. They expose USDA's lie. Over 9,000
> cows were tested last week by concerned USDA regulators. An
> increase of fifty-five percent! Had there been no mad cow,
> the numbers would have been much lower, not 55% higher. More
> cows were tested because the cow was positive for Mad Cow.
> USDA lied to America to protect cattlemen.
>
> Only USDA's Department of Enlightenment (Propaganda) lies.
> Mad Cow is here, and in order to do damage control,
> insiders are in a panic, testing more animals to prevent
> the coming plague. Why test more animals? Because USDA
> confirmed that the original animal tested positive. Had it
> not, USDA most certainly would have returned to routine
> testing. They are now in an accelerated testing mode for
> good reason. It's here...
>
> Mad Cow Testing Timeline
>
> During that ten week period prior to November 18th, 2004,
> USDA tested 60,660 cows for Mad Cow Disease, or an average
> of 6,066 per week, or an average of 867 cows per day.
> _________________________________________________
> November 15, 2004-Oklahoma Cow suspected of Mad Cow
> Disease November 16, 2004-USDA Secretary Ann Veneman
> Resigns November 17, 2004 November 18, 2004-USDA First
> announces positive Mad Cow Test November 19, 2004 November
> 20, 2004**(X=1129 cows tested each day this week) November
> 21, 2004
> _________________________________________________
> November 22, 2004 November 23, 2004-USDA Announces 7900
> Cows Tested
11/15-11/21
> November 24, 2004-USDA Announces no Mad Cow Disease November
> 25, 2004-Traditional Day Off Before Thanksgiving November
> 26, 2004-Thanksgiving Day November 27, 2004 November 28,
> 2004**(X=839 cows tested each day this week)
> _________________________________________________
> November 29, 2004 November 30, 2004-USDA Announces 5878
> Cows Tested
12/22-11/28
> December 01, 2004 December 02, 2004 December 03,
> 2004**(X=1301 cows tested each day this week) December 04,
> 2004 December 05, 2004
> _________________________________________________
> December 06, 2004 December 07, 2004-USDA Announces 9110 Cows
> Tested 11/29-12/5
>
> Had the original cow tested negative, USDA would have
> shifted their testing procedures into neutral, or into a
> lower gear. Instead, they now have their accelerator to the
> floor in the highest gear in their history. That's because
> they know the truth, and it's panic time at USDA. Now that
> the truth be known, do not expect future numbers to be true.
> They will fudge their future results. This time atound they
> were caught with their pants down. How can you be sure? Do
> not drink the milk. Do not eat the meat.
>
> Bottom line: After lying to America, USDA increased their
> testing from 839 cows per day to 1301 cows per day, an
> increase of 55%! Such an increase reflects extremely
> concerned bureaucrats. The numbers do not lie. The lies come
> from the dishonest bureaucrats in America's new elite who
> think that we need protection from ourselves.

Thank you Robert... I weaned myself off of milk two years ago,
then yogurt last year, now it looks like beef this year.

Fortunately I am coming to like salads, fruit and fish a lot.

and you are right also about the 'new elite'...here in calif
we retire our police, prison guards, Sherifs and highway
patrol at 90% of last years income...but then many fudge that
by means of there associates taking paid sick time off so they
can earn 130k or so in their last year and retire at age 51
and 10k a month.. the citizens that pay the tax supporting
that average a tenth of that.

Such a mess is not sustainable.

Phil Scott

>
> Robert Cohen http://www.notmilk.com