PDA

View Full Version : Eat up and lose weight


Welcome to the Active Low-Carber Forums

Support for Atkins diet, Protein Power, Neanderthin (Paleo Diet), CAD/CALP, Dr. Bernstein Diabetes Solution and any other healthy low-carb diet or plan, all are welcome in our lowcarb community. Forget starvation and fad diets -- join the healthy eating crowd! You may register by clicking here, it's free!



Demi
Fri, Jun-03-05, 02:52
The Times, London, UK
June 03, 2005

Eat up and lose weight
Peta Bee
Meals that fill you up are fine – the secret lies in the ingredients, says a new diet book

EAT LESS, exercise more — the secret of shedding those excess pounds couldn’t be simpler, yet the success of the Atkins, GI and GL diets show that really, we prefer our weight-loss plans to be a little more complicated (or at least, to make us feel that by buying the book, we are halfway there).
But a new diet book seems to offer a more straightforward approach. The Volumetrics Eating Plan by Professor Barbara Rolls, a nutritional scientist at Pennsylvania State University, is a simple diet that allows you to eat more of the kinds of foods that make you feel full yet which help you to lose weight.


Most people naturally consume about the same amount of food every day, says Professor Rolls. The problem is that gram for gram, some foods contain more calories than others. This means that the total calorie intake for the same volume of food can vary greatly.

It is on this energy-density principle of food that her volumetrics eating plan is based. Foods such as fat, which provides 9 calories a gram, are replaced with those that are low in calories, such as fruit, vegetables and soups. Food is categorised into one of three “energy-density” groups. Professor Rolls says that those with an energy density of less than 1 can be eaten in “satisfying portions and should form the bulk of someone’s diet”. Those scoring 1 to 2 should be eaten two or three times a day when included with main meals. Any foods with an energy density of more than 2 should be consumed only sparingly; ideally, no more than once a day.

Working out a food’s energy density is simple — divide its calories per serving by the size in grams of that serving. Calculations can be made using standard calorie books or from the nutrition labels on pre-packaged meals and snacks (the book includes a list of energy-density ratings).

Rolls and her colleagues have found that you can eat the same amount, but save on calories, by following these guidelines. In simple terms the volumetrics plan, like most diets, comprises mainly fruit and vegetables which can be eaten freely. What is surprising is that foods such as yoghurt, cottage cheese and smoothies can also be eaten as often as you like.

The volumetrics eating plan is based on clinical studies which have suggested that hunger can be satisfied without overdosing on calories. In a study presented at the North American Association for the study of Obesity at the end of last year, the Pennsylvanian State University researchers said that making small changes to the type of food eaten, but not the volume, meant that female dieters consumed 800 fewer daily calories. Each of the 24 women, aged between 19 and 35, who took part in the trial were given a total of 2.5kg (5.5lb) of food a day (an amount considered an average intake). Those who were given less energy-dense foods — a turkey sandwich instead of a pizza or a low-fat blueberry muffin instead of a cream cake — not only consumed 23 per cent fewer calories but lost weight more quickly. Yet they reported feeling as satiated as the high energy-dense group.

“In our abundant society we have a huge variety of energy-dense foods that taste good,” says Professor Rolls. “The problem is that we just keep eating them beyond when we should stop. With volumetrics, people get a consistent amount of food but not the same amount of calories.”

In a separate study published in The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Professor Rolls showed how starting a meal with a low energy-dense broth or green salad reduced the total amount of calories consumed in a sitting. A group of overweight adults given a soup or salad starter ate 56 per cent fewer calories in the pasta main course that followed and lost more weight more quickly.

Rolls has also found that dieters given two servings of soup a day in place of two dry snacks such as crisps or nuts shed excess pounds more efficiently. She says: “We want to send a message to the food industry that even subtle changes to the composition of a diet can have a huge impact on what people eat overall. You can lose weight this way.”

Claire Williamson, a nutrition scientist at the British Nutrition Foundation, describes the volumetrics plan as “a sensible approach to weight loss”. She says that plenty of studies support the theory that “the higher the energy density of a diet, the higher the total energy intake is likely to be”.

Water content and fibre influence the energy density of a food — which is why fresh fruit and vegetables feature so prominently in the volumetrics diet — as do the amount of carbohydrate, fat, protein and alcohol.

Louise Sutton, head of health and exercise science at Leeds Metropolitan University, says that Professor Rolls has come up with a way inwhich you can physically fill up your stomach nutritiously.

“There is only so much that anyone can eat,” she adds. “And if you are eating that amount of the right foods, it can only be a good thing.”

The Volumetrics Eating Plan by Barbara Rolls is published in America by HarperCollins ($25.95)


ENERGY-DENSITY RATINGS LESS THAN 1

(to be eaten freely) All fresh fruit and vegetables, low-fat yoghurt and cottage cheese, semi-skimmed milk, non-cream based soups and pasta sauces, fruit juices, smoothies

BETWEEN 1 and 2

(to be eaten in moderation) Fish, pulses and beans, brown and white rice, wholemeal pasta and bread, chicken and lean cuts of most meat, eggs, casseroles and stews.

MORE THAN 2

(to be eaten sparingly) Cheese, full fat dairy foods, ice cream, chips, crisps and biscuits, fats (margarine, butter, oils) and most fried foods




http://www.timesonline.co.uk/newspaper/0,,174-1638048_1,00.html

Bat Spit
Fri, Jun-03-05, 08:05
Umm...low fat rewrapped?

Oh, and people lose better when they get a lot of liquid, ie soups in this case.

vandi68
Fri, Jun-03-05, 08:17
Yep, same low fat crap different author. And their subjects were all basically of the optimal age to lose weight fairly easily. I had no trouble losing on a low-fat diet when I was only 27, at 37 I gain instead.

K Walt
Fri, Jun-03-05, 08:35
By this reasoning, the ideal diet foods would be . . . in this order. . .

Water-soaked Cotton

Water-soaked Dish sponges

Water-soaked Sawdust.

High volume, low calories. It will food your body into thinking you're full!! Marvellous idea.

Except our whole evolutionary heritage is designed to make us prefer nutrient-dense food. Our systems aren't fooled by high-volume, low-value food. It somehow senses there is precious little fuel in all that bulk. And you get hungry anyway. At least I did, when I tried this silliness years ago.

seyont
Fri, Jun-03-05, 09:39
Volumetrics is new?

"Volumetrics
(HarperCollins, 2000), a new book by Penn State [Go Lions!] nutrition and obesity researcher Barbara Rolls, Ph.D..."

(Thank you, Google)

I'm surprised that a professor has done so little in five years. Volumetrics is kind of a cute twist, but come on...a series of books, a diet empire?

By the way, eating a tire works wonders. It permanently fills you up and is cheaper than stomach stapling.

tie_guy
Fri, Jun-03-05, 09:47
I think part of the reason that low fat diets are so popular is that they allow us to blame the victum. People get to think that it is your fault that you are fat because you eat too much. Here fatso just eat a lot of low fat food that way you can shove more bulk into your fat face and still eat fewer calories. It is obvious that you don't have the ability to stop eating when you are no longer hungry because if you could you wouldn't be fat.

Being able to blame the victum has many great advantages. It allows us to be smug and feel superiour to those of us that are overweight. Even better it gets rid of the nasty fear that some day we too could get inflicted with the same problem. I won't get fat -- I can control my eating habbits! Unlike you, you lazy slob. No doubt this is why blaming the victum for many other inflictions that are their fault is just as popular. It is somehow your fault you got that genetic disease!

Of course the idea that people become overweight because of a turn in the gene pool dice is unthinkable. I mean if something like genes determined your weight then we could no longer feel superior to others. What is worse is that this would mean that one day I or someone I love could get fat! That can't be I have spent that last years making fun of those that are fat.

What is even more unthinkable is the idea that the very advise we are giving out could in fact be causing more people to get fat. Sure it is true that since we have been giving out the low fat advice people have only gotten fatter and fatter but that must be because people have gotten lazier and lazier -- or video games or something. Blame McDonalds yeah that's it, that's the ticket! Why we are "experts" we know what we are talking about. So you are all lazy slobs and what we said before is true even if there is a lot of pesky evidence to prove us wrong.

So eat low fat and stop bothering us! Yes you can go through the rest of your life eating low fat and being hungry it is your punishment for being a fat and lazy slob in the first place. Ignore those people that push low carb diets. Being able to loose weight, improve your health, and not suffer by being hungry all of the time? That has got to be wrong! Why listen to your body? You are your enemy! You are fat because you can't control yourself. Now lower your self esteem to the proper levels and go away!

tom sawyer
Fri, Jun-03-05, 11:52
I don't see where they can get off saying that you wqill feel full or satisfied, eating low fat. I did it once, lost 35lb and I was CONSTANTLY HUNGRY! No matter how much of my low-fat stuff I would eat, I never felt satisfied. And I cooked well for myself too, had variety and plenty of sppicy stuff. It was just never satiating. Nothing like low carb. I've lost the same weight on low carb, and feel totally satisified from every meal. In fact, there are times when it is time for lunch and I'm not even really hungry so I just eat light.

From now on, whenever I see the word "nutrionist" in an article I'm going to substitute the word "idiot" to save time.

Kristine
Fri, Jun-03-05, 12:36
Unreal. I can't believe there's still anyone over the age of 25 or so who doesn't remember what it's like to try to fool your body into thinking you've eaten enough food, when all you've really eaten is a lot of water and fiber. That slightly bloated and sick feeling that, disappointly, was still accompanied by the urge to eat real food. You might trick your psyche with a big pile of "empty" food, but you'll never fool your appetite for long.

The volumetrics eating plan is based on clinical studies which have suggested that hunger can be satisfied without overdosing on calories.

So is low carb. :D

Roma-girl
Fri, Jun-03-05, 15:58
"""The volumetrics eating plan is based on clinical studies which have suggested that hunger can be satisfied without overdosing on calories."""

So is low carb.

Only low carb does it so much better! :yum:

kmct10
Sat, Jun-04-05, 01:16
The only thing "new" about this diet is that the obligatory LC SMEAR first paragraph has been added, denigrating all those diets who try to sell you books - while pushing it's own pulpy books!

steveed
Sat, Jun-04-05, 01:30
Hmmmm...
juicy hamburger with blue cheese and mushrooms or a whole package of dry brown rice cakes and 500 celery sticks.
Rough choice!