PDA

View Full Version : Zone Diet Wins In Varsity Study (New Zealand)


Welcome to the Active Low-Carber Forums

Support for Atkins diet, Protein Power, Neanderthin (Paleo Diet), CAD/CALP, Dr. Bernstein Diabetes Solution and any other healthy low-carb diet or plan, all are welcome in our lowcarb community. Forget starvation and fad diets -- join the healthy eating crowd! You may register by clicking here, it's free!



nobimbo
Fri, Oct-29-04, 17:33
Zone diet wins in varsity study

30.10.2004
By SIMON COLLINS
Otago University has found that overweight women lose weight more quickly on the "Zone" diet than if they follow conventional dietary advice.

A study by the university's Edgar National Centre for Diabetes Research found that women also lost weight faster on the controversial Atkins diet, but they started to gain weight again within a year.

The study concludes that the Zone diet, promoted by American doctor Barry Sears, "may be the best overall approach to reducing the risk of cardiovascular disease and Type 2 diabetes".

The lead researcher, Dr Kirsten McAuley, said that although thousands of studies had been made of the Atkins diet, the Otago research was the world's first direct comparison of Atkins, Zone and conventional dietary advice in a test which did not have a high dropout rate.

Eighty-eight per cent of the overweight Dunedin women in the study stuck it out for at least a year, providing data on 96 women with an average age of 45.

All were "insulin-resistant", a pre-diabetic condition where the body's ability to use insulin to absorb sugar is reduced.

In full diabetics, insulin resistance causes a dangerous buildup of blood sugar which the body cannot absorb.

In the pre-diabetic stage, the body copes by producing more insulin.

The women were divided into three groups - one on the Atkins diet, one on the Zone diet and the third being given conventional diet advice.

The Atkins and Zone diets aim to slash intake of carbohydrates, including sugar.

Dr McAuley said the Atkins was more extreme, starting with 20g of carbohydrates a day, equivalent to half a slice of toast or half a banana.

The Zone diet emphasises high protein foods to offset low carbohydrates, advocating a balance of one-third low-fat protein such as meat, eggs and beans, and two-thirds fruit and vegetables.

Conventional dietary advice also emphasises eating plenty of fruit and vegetables, but with less emphasis on meat because of worries about high fat increasing the heart attack risk.

Researcher Kylie Smith told the first conference of the New Zealand branch of the Australasian Society for the Study of Obesity in Auckland yesterday that all the women in the study were seen weekly for four months and then checked again at six months and a year.

After six months the women on the Atkins and Zone diets had lost an average of 8kg. Women following conventional advice lost only 5kg.

After a year, the Atkins dieters were gaining weight again and were 5.4kg below their starting points. The conventional eaters were still 4.5kg lighter, and the Zoners were the winners with average weights 6.5kg below where they started.

Dr McAuley warned that diabetics with signs of kidney disease should avoid the Zone diet.

"There is no one best bet or wonder diet that's going to solve obesity," she said. "We need to consider a variety of options for different people who have different eating habits and preferences."

Surprisingly, the study found that after six months, women on all three diets had about the same amount of "bad" LDL cholesterol, the main warning signal for heart attacks.

"It was expected that LDL would increase under the Atkins diet," Ms Smith said.

Atkins allows people to eat high-fat steaks as long as they have minimal carbohydrates.

After two months, the conventional eaters were getting 49 per cent of their energy calories from carbohydrates, compared with 34 per cent for the Zoners and 11 per cent under the Atkins diet.

But the Atkins dieters paid a painful price - "a significant number" needed to take anti-constipation pills because they missed out on bread and other high-fibre foods.

They ate an average of only 9g a day of dietary fibre, compared with about 20g a day for both the other two groups.

"Those on the Zone diet did seem to enjoy it better," Ms Smith said.

How old and new compare

CONVENTIONAL ADVICE

* Eat plenty of fruit and veges (at least two fruits and three vegetables a day).

* Eat plenty of breads and cereals, preferably wholegrain (six daily slices of bread, half-cups of breakfast cereal or cups of rice or pasta).

* Drink low-fat milk and dairy products (two daily glasses of milk or pottles of yoghurt or four slices of cheese).

* Eat one serving a day of meat, eggs and nuts (two slices of meat, one steak, one chicken leg, one fish fillet, one egg or three-quarters of a cup of beans).

* Aim to get calories from carbohydrates 50-55 per cent, fat 30-33 per cent (including 8-10 per cent saturated fat), protein 11-15 per cent.

* Aim for 30g of fibre a day from vegetables, wholegrains, beans and peas.

ATKINS DIET

* Initial daily limit of 20g of carbohydrate, obtained from unprocessed salads and other non-starchy vegetables. Avoid high-sugar processed foods such as bread, rice, pasta or vegetables grown underground.

* Eat mainly meat, dairy products and salad vegetables to keep you full.

* Gradually increase carbohydrates such as high-fibre veges, fruits, beans, peas and wholegrains to the level that keeps your body at the right weight.

* Take multivitamin pills and an essential oils/fatty acid formula to ensure adequate nutrition.

* No precise aims for calorie intake proportions, but very low carbohydrate means high proteins and fats.

ZONE DIET

* Eat at last three meals and two snacks a day to stay within the "zone" where you are not hungry and have a clear mental focus.

* Divide your plate into three equal sections. One-third should be enough low-fat protein to fit in the palm of your hand, and two-thirds should be fruits and vegetables, with a dash of fat such as olive oil.

* Eat plenty of leafy green vegetables and fruits.

* Eat less pasta, breads, grains and starches.

* Aim to get calories from protein 30 per cent, fat 30 per cent, carbohydrates 40 per cent.

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/storydisplay.cfm?storyID=3605474&thesection=news&thesubsection=general

mio1996
Sat, Oct-30-04, 09:55
I lost confidence in this study as soon as it said that half a slice of toast contains 20g of carbohydrate.

Even so, I read the entire article and it occurred to me that the women on the Atkins diet who started gaining weight before the year was over were no longer following the diet, regardless of the article saying that the data came from 96 women who "stuck it out for at least a year."

My proof is as follows, and is simple logic: DANDR says to increase carbohydrate intake until the point of stall, then fall back 5 carbs per day until you start losing again, right? And then when you reach goal weight, you find the level that keeps your weight stable, right? That means, by logical extension, that these participants who regained weight clearly were not following the diet at the end of the year, and had not been for some time.

I have never known a lc'er to regain weight while in strict adherence to the principles of Atkins. Some people stall, but regain must be very rare if it happens at at all. Therefore, I find the statistics in this study to be unbelievable.

Besides this, I also find it hard to believe that the Atkins participants, over the course of a year, averaged 9 grams of fiber per day. That would seem to be lower than induction levels to me, but I could be wrong.

My contention is that this study ignored evidence that it found convenient to ignore (for exmaple, left participants in the "stuck it out for at least a year group" who clearly didn't belong there) to skew the results in favor of the more politically correct Zone Diet.

This is why I tend to disbelieve any study I read. Does anyone see a problem with my logic here? Am I missing something?

Lisa N
Sat, Oct-30-04, 10:11
After six months the women on the Atkins and Zone diets had lost an average of 8kg. Women following conventional advice lost only 5kg.

After a year, the Atkins dieters were gaining weight again and were 5.4kg below their starting points. The conventional eaters were still 4.5kg lighter, and the Zoners were the winners with average weights 6.5kg below where they started.

Based on this, all of the participants had started regaining weight at the 1 year mark which leads me to believe that once they started following the women less closely, compliance started slipping in all groups.
Atkins and Zone dieters were at an 8 kg loss at the 6 month mark, but Zone ended the year at 6.5 (a net regain of 1.5 kg) and Atkins at 5.4 (a regain of 2.6 kg) and the conventional dieters at 4.5 (a regain of .5 kg).

mio1996
Sat, Oct-30-04, 11:48
Lol, I guess I showed my own bias there, didn't I? How embarrassing, I guess I need to go back to journalism 101.

Thanks for pointing that out, Lisa.

I guess then what this study proves is only that all diets have drop out rates (and perhaps people who lie and say they are in compliance when they are clearly not?). However, it doesn't even prove greater uncompliance in Atkins dieters, though, since we all know that lc'ers gain back weight very quickly when they cheat (I can easily gain 5 pounds of water weight the first day, which is almost the same as the 2.6 kg average gain of the Atkins participants. This disadvantage could have seriously skewed the Atkins results, IMO) and besides that the Atkins group had still kept off more weight than the conventional group.

From this study, we have no idea what these 3 diets can accomplish at all since it was clearly skewed by uncomliance! It's another case of junk science, taking people's word that they are eating what they say they are and using it to compile a study.

Besides that, the six months results lump Atkins and The Zone together, which could also have been for statistical purposes.

These studies disgust me. These people are supposedly scientists yet they don't even know how to perform a simple study!

caligrrl
Sun, Oct-31-04, 11:14
This study is not well controlled, but it does give some idea of what happens to dieters in the real world. They start out strong, then slip up. It's no surprise to see the low carbers did the best.

The Zone is closer to Atkins Maintenance. Maybe those dieters had a better one year result because they had less transitioning to do, they were already on a maintenance type diet.

Kristine
Sun, Oct-31-04, 12:18
I'm not sure if it's a lousy study or just lousy journalism, but: But the Atkins dieters paid a painful price - "a significant number" needed to take anti-constipation pills because they missed out on bread and other high-fibre foods.

Since when is bread, even whole wheat, a high fiber food? :lol:

It never fails to amaze me; the utter ignorance toward basic concepts in nutrition.

Nancy LC
Sun, Oct-31-04, 12:21
pottles of yoghurt




Now... what the heck is a pottle? :)
Since when is bread, even whole wheat, a high fiber food?
Well, lets see... probably an average slice of whole wheat bread contains maybe... 2g of fiber? You're supposed to eat about 25g of fiber a day. So that'd be about 12 slices of bread.

Contrast that with LC bread which has quite a lot of fiber. Probably 4-5g of fiber. In fact, low carb products generally have tons of fiber in them compared to their full-carb bretheren.