PDA

View Full Version : Not all fat is bad, it's where you carry it that matters


Welcome to the Active Low-Carber Forums

Support for Atkins diet, Protein Power, Neanderthin (Paleo Diet), CAD/CALP, Dr. Bernstein Diabetes Solution and any other healthy low-carb diet or plan, all are welcome in our lowcarb community. Forget starvation and fad diets -- join the healthy eating crowd! You may register by clicking here, it's free!



Demi
Wed, Oct-13-04, 13:38
The following news has featured in a number of newspapers in the UK today:



The Times, London, UK
13 October, 2003

Having a big waist can increase your risk of diabetes and heart disease

WATCH your waist, not your weight, a doctor will tell the National Obesity Forum meeting in London today.
It is not total weight but where you carry it that matters most, according to Anthony Barnett, Professor of Medicine at the University of Birmingham, and a leading expert on the links between obesity and diabetes.

Fat around the stomach, a “beer gut” or apple shape, could prove deadly but the same amount of weight carried on the thighs, the pear shape, will be less so.



The reason, only now becoming clear, is that fat cells around the stomach are different from fat cells elsewhere. The unwanted chemicals they pump out can damage the insulin system, raising the risk of diabetes and heart disease.

Professor Barnett plans to say that it is time to throw away the bathroom scales and reach for the tape measure. He will say: “Waist measurements can predict the risks of type 2 diabetes and heart disease more accurately than weight.

“Men with waists of more than 40in and women with waist measurements of more than 35in are at an incredibly high risk of type 2 diabetes and heart disease.

“Thicker waistlines may double to quadruple these risks, compared to those with slimmer waistlines. Even a lower waist of 37in in men and 32in in women may significantly raise the risk of either of these diseases, if not both.” Professor Barnett will be a keynote speaker at the conference taking place today and tomorrow.

“We’re reaching the point where if obesity increases at the present rate, within the next ten years some 10 per cent of the population will suffer from diabetes and its related complications,” he will say.

Type 2 diabetes can be caused by insulin resistance, triggered in part by excess weight around the abdomen.

Insulin produced in the pancreas stops working properly in overweight and obese people. The fatter the person, and the larger their waistline, the more resistant to insulin they become.

“The more resistant you are to insulin, the more insulin the body has to produce from the pancreas gland in order to have the same effect,” Professor Barnett believes.

“Eventually the pancreas becomes exhausted and either stops producing as much insulin, or in severe cases, may stop producing insulin altogether.”

Professor Barnett and his colleagues have been in the forefront of the growing understanding that fat cells around the waistline are not simply passive lumps of lard, but are highly active, producing and pumping out proteins and hormones.

In small doses these are necessary but in excess they cause damage not just to the way insulin is used, but also by raising blood pressure and increasing the amount of cholesterol in the bloodstream.

Professor Barnett points out that people aged 40 and over, even of relatively average weight, may double their risks of developing type 2 diabetes and heart disease if they gain a stone. “Any weight gain in the 40-65 age group is associated with insulin not working properly in body tissue and muscle.” The solution, according to Professor Barnett, lies in shedding pounds in those who are overweight, and preventing those extra pounds from building up in those of normal weight.

Drug treatments are also being tested. Drugs belonging to the glitazone family, currently given to type 2 diabetes sufferers before they need insulin, are being tested on those at risk of developing the disease, to gauge whether they may be used to prevent, as well as treat the condition.



http://www.timesonline.co.uk/newspaper/0,,172-1306869,00.html



Similar article on the BBC News site:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/3737064.stm

nikkil
Fri, Oct-15-04, 06:03
Hmmmm, mine's just under 33 right now.... Yet another reason to take measurements :)

TwilightZ
Fri, Oct-15-04, 07:08
The reason, only now becoming clear, is that fat cells around the stomach are different from fat cells elsewhere. The unwanted chemicals they pump out can damage the insulin system, raising the risk of diabetes and heart disease.

Professor Barnett and his colleagues have been in the forefront of the growing understanding that fat cells around the waistline are not simply passive lumps of lard, but are highly active, producing and pumping out proteins and hormones.

Fat cells are producing hormones and proteins? Oh, so fat cells are now glands? And producing proteins? Is this some other species of human we're not aware of?

These geniuses have determined that the cause of insulin resistance is being fat, not the foods that caused you to get that way. So according to them, all you have to do is lose the waist body fat in any way, and that will eliminate the insulin resistance.

Boy, it must be a blast these days in academia. Being able to get tenure and draw a nice salary for life. And just sit around and make things up--and people believe you because you're a "scientist."

Lez
Fri, Oct-15-04, 07:23
now I see what going on

(((Drug treatments are also being tested)))

Lez

tom sawyer
Fri, Oct-15-04, 08:31
No doubt about it, from now on I'm storing my fat on my buttocks. Anybody got tips on how you can do that? Are there any drugs under development for that?

Nancy LC
Fri, Oct-15-04, 08:48
Hmmm.... I'm a pear, Tom. Its easy to store fat on your buttocks and thighs. You just do it!

Fat cells are producing hormones and proteins? Oh, so fat cells are now glands? And producing proteins? Is this some other species of human we're not aware of?


Yes, fat cells are hormonally active. New stuff they're finding out.

http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&ie=UTF-8&q=fat+cell+hormone

Here's one (http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2004/04/040422224153.htm) of many articles about it.

cc48510
Fri, Oct-15-04, 09:05
Before LCing: 48.0/53.0/54.0/34.0 (Chest/Waist/Hips/Thighs)
Since.. LCing: 40.0/33.5/40.0/23.5 (Chest/Waist/Hips/Thighs)

My waist is much better, though I could probably go a few inches smaller. My Hips are much larger though, and I've still got to get rid of the excess fat on my Thighs.

tom sawyer
Fri, Oct-15-04, 10:01
Nancy, you pear-shaped braggert you.

cc, so do you think that just doing lc preferentially reduces the worst fat from our bodies, ie the spare tire? I could see where that might be the case.

tom sawyer
Fri, Oct-15-04, 10:03
I've always heard that targetting exercises to a specific area like the stomach, is not very effective. So I suppose situps would not work in the absence of changes in diet? I hope not, I hate situps.

Nancy LC
Fri, Oct-15-04, 10:18
I've always heard that targetting exercises to a specific area like the stomach, is not very effective. So I suppose situps would not work in the absence of changes in diet? I hope not, I hate situps.


What I've read is your body gets to choose where you burn the fat from, not you. :p However, exercising a muscle makes the muscle bigger and stronger!

Hellistile
Fri, Oct-15-04, 10:30
When I commenced low-carbing I noticed something that I had not before on any diet: I lost weight starting at the breastbone and going downward. The first inkling that I was low-carbing is that my bra strap around my torso was loosening up. I was one of those people who packed the fat on in and around my chest (very bad and that's why the stroke at age 46). Low fat dieting didn't remove it like low-carbing has. This gives me yet one more reason as to how beneficial low-carbing really is (as though I needed any more convincing).

TwilightZ
Fri, Oct-15-04, 13:04
Yes, fat cells are hormonally active. New stuff they're finding out.

http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&ie=UTF-8&q=fat+cell+hormone

Here's one (http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2004/04/040422224153.htm) of many articles about it.

Nancy, thank you. I stand corrected.

cc48510
Fri, Oct-15-04, 15:23
http://www.cs.uwf.edu/~ccarr/overall.gif

Red = Waist
Blue = Hips
Orange = Chest
Black = Thighs

BTW, the orange line is slightly misaligned [because I put 4 graphs together.] It should be slightly above the Blue line at the end, not slightly below.

mio1996
Fri, Oct-15-04, 16:48
When I commenced low-carbing I noticed something that I had not before on any diet: I lost weight starting at the breastbone and going downward. The first inkling that I was low-carbing is that my bra strap around my torso was loosening up. I was one of those people who packed the fat on in and around my chest (very bad and that's why the stroke at age 46). Low fat dieting didn't remove it like low-carbing has. This gives me yet one more reason as to how beneficial low-carbing really is (as though I needed any more convincing).

I found the same to be true for me, Hellistile (except the part about the bra loosening :) ). Much of my excess weight was in the chest. I was once down to about 185 lbs on a low fat starvation regimen and I never saw my breastbone nor ribs in the mirror. Now, lcing at 190-195 pounds I can see them.

liz175
Sat, Oct-16-04, 06:09
Insulin makes people put on weight in their abdominal area (apple-shaped). That's why apple-shaped people are almost always insulin resistant -- their bodies have to put out very high levels of insulin to deal with the carbs they eat. By low carbing, and keeping our insulin levels low, we can stop that process and (hopefully) gradually start to lose the apple-shape.

ceberezin
Sat, Oct-16-04, 10:59
Insulin resistance, a disorder in which target tissues--muscle, fat, and liver cells--fail to use insulin effectively, accompanies and usually precedes type 2 diabetes. Eighty percent of people with type 2 diabetes are overweight, but the mechanism by which obesity sets the stage for insulin resistance and diabetes has long puzzled scientists.

This is a quotation from the article to which Nancy LC provided the link. It's just amazing that scientists are so doggedly pursuing this quarter under the wrong street lamp. They might as well puzzle over how fire engines cause fires. They're so desperate to make fat the issue.

The reason for this persistence becomes clear when you understand that the point of this research is to produce a drug that counters the hormonal effects of these fat cells and resensitizes people to insulin, since you can't produce a drug that lowers insulin directly.

Once again, the medical/pharmaceutical complex produces dangerous scientific distortions. What will happen when people with hyperinsulinemia take an insulin resensitizing drug? They'll go into insulin shock--that's what!

tom sawyer
Mon, Oct-18-04, 12:04
Look at the bright side. Eventually the medical establishment will have us on so many pills, that we won't have to EAT anything else.

OK thats not a bright side. Sue me.