PDA

View Full Version : Low-Carb Atkins Lashes Out At Other Diet Programs


Welcome to the Active Low-Carber Forums

Support for Atkins diet, Protein Power, Neanderthin (Paleo Diet), CAD/CALP, Dr. Bernstein Diabetes Solution and any other healthy low-carb diet or plan, all are welcome in our lowcarb community. Forget starvation and fad diets -- join the healthy eating crowd! You may register by clicking here, it's free!



nobimbo
Tue, Oct-12-04, 04:26
Mon. Oct. 11 2004 5:35 PM ET

Low-carb Atkins lashes out at other diet programs
Canadian Press

TORONTO — Too much turkey got you thinking about a quickie diet?

Think again, say the champions of the no-bread craze.

Those behind the Atkins plan have come out swinging against other eating programs in the wake of new federal regulations that target low-carb claims.

Nevermind that many consider the Atkins approach to be a fad itself.

Atkins Nutritionals Inc. is issuing its first-ever "health warning" saying its "lifelong" approach is better than get-thin-quick schemes.

"Quick-fix diets tend not to work if it's not part of a lifelong nutritional plan," says company medical director Dr. Stuart Trager, not naming names.

"It's not sustainable and leads to yo-yo dieting."

Atkins pushes meat, eggs and cheese while restricting so-called bad carbs such as bread, rice and fruit, especially at the beginning of the program.

Adherents boast of immediate weight loss but critics say it's overly restrictive, not advised for active people and is difficult to maintain, leading to eventual weight gain.

"Many people focus only on the first phase," complains Trager, referring to the diet's "induction" stage.

"What Atkins does is teach people to make smarter choices to control their carbohydrates."

Whether it's smarter or not is up for debate, according to the federal government.

New labelling regulations take effect next year that force food and beverage packaging to eliminate all references to low-carbohydrate benefits.

Carb content must be listed on the packaging, but other carb-related claims, including those in the product's brand name or trademark, would be prohibited.

It's a bold step to counter low-carb health claims led by Atkins, but also championed by the popular South Beach and Scarsdale diets.

Many low-carb diets are quite "sensible" and weight loss can occur rapidly, but the long-term effects have yet to be tested, says Dr. David Jenkins, Canada Research Chair in Nutrition and Metabolism.

"Will these diets end up raising cholesterol levels to the extent that we deem unacceptable?" Jenkins asks.

In the end, Jenkins warns dieting in its "extreme form" is always dangerous.

The best safeguard against obesity is to eat sensibly and exercise, he says.

Trager says Atkins recommends nutrient-dense carbohydrates as well as a variety of protein and good fats such as those in fish and vegetable oils.

Limiting bad carbohydrates controls blood sugar, allowing the body to more effectively burn excess fat, Trager says from Philadelphia, Pa.

His attack on fad diets follows an Atkins-commissioned survey that found an apparently disillusioned public when it comes to dieting.

The survey, conducted by Ekos Research Associates in August, asked 1,026 Canadians about diet issues including post-diet weight gain and eating habits.

More than 50 per cent agreed low-carb diets are a fast way to lose weight, but more than one-third said it was a bad approach. More than half of those surveyed said they were unsure of low-carb claims.

Eighty-nine per cent said they understood the risks of fad dieting while 73 per cent were aware of the negative impact of yo-yo dieting.

http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/1097530543616_21/?hub=Health

tom sawyer
Tue, Oct-12-04, 09:08
"Will these diets end up raising cholesterol levels to the extent that we deem unacceptable?" Jenkins asks.

Given that this approach is well over 100 years old, I think we should be asking Dr. Jenkins to get off his lazy a$$ and provide the answer to this very question. We already know the answer for the high carb diet.

I don't think there was a single redeeming feature in this little piece of fluff.

jadefox26
Tue, Oct-12-04, 09:10
LOL ~ Tom I totally agree - what a load of hogwash

LC-Laur
Tue, Oct-12-04, 09:41
I hate articles on low carb... As a journalist I strive to write articles that are fair to BOTH SIDES of the story and don't obviously lean towards one side... Most articles on low carb either tell a bunch of lies or scew the truth, giving people an unrealistic idea of what low carb is all about. They needed more emphasis on the part where is said:

"Many people focus only on the first phase," complains Trager, referring to the diet's "induction" stage.

"Complains Trager"?!?!?!?!?!? Jesus! Little words like that make articles so biased! The first thing you're taught in school is to ALWAYS say "said" and NO OTHER words because it can taint the article! Sorry to get so upset about that, I guess when you see other writers use tactics like that you tend to get a little upset... *ahem*

Anyway, my final opinion: Get off your soap box mr. anti-low carb sissy writer-main. (tee hee)

Lessara
Tue, Oct-12-04, 10:23
Not only is the information not correct - I eat fruit and Veggies, Buddy! and its on Atkins! But it also makes us look like we are enemies to low fat dieters. Which in truth, does work for others. Its real simple if you think about it. Fat and Carbs need to be watched and kept apart. If you are low fat you stay away from Fat and if you are low carb you stay about from carbs. Not that tough. But this really hit home to me today.
One of my co-workers is on a low fat diet. I noticed she had lost weight and since she commented on my loss I commented on her's. I asked what she was doing. She hesitated. I said, "What is it?" She said "I hope you aren't upset but I'm on a low fat diet." I said, "I'm so glad it works for you!" She was surprised I wasn't upset. I told her that not every diet works the same for everyone. I'm insilin resistant, she isn't. Hence why low carbing works for me and low fat works for her. Now we are buddies again. :)

ceberezin
Tue, Oct-12-04, 11:20
In the end, Jenkins warns dieting in its "extreme form" is always dangerous.

The best safeguard against obesity is to eat sensibly and exercise, he says.

Hold on a minute! Low-fat dieting is an extreme form of dieting. Its dangers have been amply demonstrated. Also "sensible" is a loaded word. Is low-fat sensible?

Lessara's friend may have lost weight on a low-fat diet, but that diet will not allow her to control the insulin resistance and hyperinsulinemia that caused the weight gain in the first place.
Even though she has lost weight, she is still likely to get the other disorders of metabolic syndrome. The issue is insulin resistance, not being overweight. Insulin resistance is a relative term. It doesn't matter whether Lessara's friend meets the clinical definition of insulin resistant. The fact that she was overweight means that the process that leads to clinical insulin resistance is going on. If she continues her low-fat, high-carb diet, she soon will meet that definition of clinically insulin resistant.

tom sawyer
Tue, Oct-12-04, 12:58
I agree with you ceberezin. Something that struck me as a very believable point, was/is Rosedale's assertion that obesity, diabetes, circulatory disorders, and other diseases are all symptoms of insulin resistance. With the most important point to me being, that obesity is not the root cause of the other symptoms. That was enlightening. I knew that being skinny didn't mean you were healthy (Jim Fixx example), but I assumed that obesity meant you had to be unhealthy. Now I know that is not necessarily the case, although they are two symptoms of the same root cause.

arc
Wed, Oct-13-04, 12:44
Mon. Oct. 11 2004 5:35 PM ET
TORONTO — Too much turkey got you thinking about a quickie diet?

Uhhh .... no. Too many potatoes and chips (and candy bars and pizza and ...) did.

mio1996
Thu, Oct-14-04, 08:21
I hate articles on low carb... As a journalist I strive to write articles that are fair to BOTH SIDES of the story and don't obviously lean towards one side... Most articles on low carb either tell a bunch of lies or scew the truth, giving people an unrealistic idea of what low carb is all about. They needed more emphasis on the part where is said:

"Many people focus only on the first phase," complains Trager, referring to the diet's "induction" stage.

"Complains Trager"?!?!?!?!?!? Jesus! Little words like that make articles so biased! The first thing you're taught in school is to ALWAYS say "said" and NO OTHER words because it can taint the article! Sorry to get so upset about that, I guess when you see other writers use tactics like that you tend to get a little upset... *ahem*

Anyway, my final opinion: Get off your soap box mr. anti-low carb sissy writer-main. (tee hee)

It is great to see a young reporter who knows the difference between news and editorial writing! Such knowledge seems to have gotten lost over the years. Almost every article in the newspaper seems to be an editorial nowadays! Where do these people get their credentials? It amazes me that I, as an untrained spectator, know the difference while most writers do not!