Bob Keeter
Sun, Jul-20-03, 06:12
Michael,
Hope that you didnt think that I had forgot (or even as Dear
Ole Phil, Esq. had suggested, that I was "shucking and
jiving"!). Did have some real programming errors I had to deal
with, and those simply take time and a "eureka moment" or two.
But I did keep plugging away. . . .
The software itself is still a bit rough on user friendly
GUI driven issues, but here is the cut through that data you
had offered.
Checked Pair Matching strings Total Matched
1/distance AF346983/J01415.1(ger/pla) 31 16419 530
AF346963/J01415.1(abo/pla) 31 16163 521
AF346983/AF346963(ger/abo) 34 16510 486
AF346983/AF346989(ger/jap) 40 16442 411 AF346989/J01415.1
(jap/pla) 42 16389 390 AF346963/AG346989(abo/jap) 44
16435 374 AF346963/AF347008 (abo/san) 90 16352 182
AF346989/AF347008 (jap/san) 93 16416 177
AF346983/AF347008 (ger/san) 94 16361 174
AF347008/J01415.1 (san/pla) 94 15975 170
Did not do the Chimp yet. Does not look like I got a
clean download.
What this data SEEMS to say to me is that I have samples from
three groups. First there is the German, the Aborigine, and
the J01415.1 sample. Then I have the japanese sample, with the
San more distant from any of the three others than either of
those three are from another. To make any real conclusions out
of this, I would also need to run multiple samples of each
(for example, Ten different German sets, ten different
Japanese sets, etc just to find how much "distance" there is
in a given group.
Still not sure if its a 1/x function for distance or a
1/x^2, etc.
Working on it though!
Regards bk
Hope that you didnt think that I had forgot (or even as Dear
Ole Phil, Esq. had suggested, that I was "shucking and
jiving"!). Did have some real programming errors I had to deal
with, and those simply take time and a "eureka moment" or two.
But I did keep plugging away. . . .
The software itself is still a bit rough on user friendly
GUI driven issues, but here is the cut through that data you
had offered.
Checked Pair Matching strings Total Matched
1/distance AF346983/J01415.1(ger/pla) 31 16419 530
AF346963/J01415.1(abo/pla) 31 16163 521
AF346983/AF346963(ger/abo) 34 16510 486
AF346983/AF346989(ger/jap) 40 16442 411 AF346989/J01415.1
(jap/pla) 42 16389 390 AF346963/AG346989(abo/jap) 44
16435 374 AF346963/AF347008 (abo/san) 90 16352 182
AF346989/AF347008 (jap/san) 93 16416 177
AF346983/AF347008 (ger/san) 94 16361 174
AF347008/J01415.1 (san/pla) 94 15975 170
Did not do the Chimp yet. Does not look like I got a
clean download.
What this data SEEMS to say to me is that I have samples from
three groups. First there is the German, the Aborigine, and
the J01415.1 sample. Then I have the japanese sample, with the
San more distant from any of the three others than either of
those three are from another. To make any real conclusions out
of this, I would also need to run multiple samples of each
(for example, Ten different German sets, ten different
Japanese sets, etc just to find how much "distance" there is
in a given group.
Still not sure if its a 1/x function for distance or a
1/x^2, etc.
Working on it though!
Regards bk