PDA

View Full Version : evolutionists unsuccessful search for transitional fossils.

Welcome to the Active Low-Carber Forums

Support for Atkins diet, Protein Power, Neanderthin (Paleo Diet), CAD/CALP, Dr. Bernstein Diabetes Solution and any other healthy low-carb diet or plan, all are welcome in our lowcarb community. Forget starvation and fad diets -- join the healthy eating crowd! You may register by clicking here, it's free!



Metaframe
Sat, Jul-05-03, 18:22
Read about evolutionists unsuccessful search for transitional
fossils. http://www.icr.org/pubs/imp/imp-250.htm
Philip Dei
Sat, Jul-05-03, 18:22
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003 20:02:47 -0700, "Metaframe"
<Metaframe1@sydney.au> wrote:

>Read about evolutionists unsuccessful search for transitional
>fossils. http://www.icr.org/pubs/imp/imp-250.htm

Note the www.icr.org and the frequent use of it by a
recent poster to s.a.p. (a.k.a. Simply I and S.. I...
V...) what are the odds that this is a sock puppet. Also
note the "alt.talk.creationism" in the NG line.
DNAPaleoAnth at att dot net
Jakub Gaud
Sat, Jul-05-03, 18:22
"Metaframe" <Metaframe1@sydney.au> wrote in message
news:rXrMa.1203$jk4.145031@news.uswest.net...
> Read about evolutionists unsuccessful search for
> transitional fossils.
> http://www.icr.org/pubs/imp/imp-250.htm

Ehhh, can you please post a link that does NOT have the
acronym ICR in it? Thanks.

Jakub
Lane Lewis
Sat, Jul-05-03, 18:22
"Metaframe" <Metaframe1@sydney.au> wrote in message
news:rXrMa.1203$jk4.145031@news.uswest.net...
> Read about evolutionists unsuccessful search for
> transitional fossils.
> http://www.icr.org/pubs/imp/imp-250.htm
>

1994 ????

Creationist continue to be out of step with the times.

Transitional having features of both modern man and apes.
http://www.nature.com/nsu/030609/030609-8.html

Fish with legs and 32 toes http://tolweb.org/tree?group=Acant-
hostega&contgroup=Terrestrial_Vertebrates

the pebbles that starts the pearls

Lane
David Sien
Sat, Jul-05-03, 18:22
"Metaframe" <Metaframe1@sydney.au> wrote in message
news:<rXrMa.1203$jk4.145031@news.uswest.net>...
> Read about evolutionists unsuccessful search for
> transitional fossils.
> http://www.icr.org/pubs/imp/imp-250.htm

Why?

It's outdated. It was wrong when it was originally published.

There's really no point. Hell, even other creationists tend to
think that the ICR is a bit passe.