PDA

View Full Version : (Caution may offend some) "In the end, Dr Atkins had to pay up"


Welcome to the Active Low-Carber Forums

Support for Atkins diet, Protein Power, Neanderthin (Paleo Diet), CAD/CALP, Dr. Bernstein Diabetes Solution and any other healthy low-carb diet or plan, all are welcome in our lowcarb community. Forget starvation and fad diets -- join the healthy eating crowd! You may register by clicking here, it's free!



gotbeer
Wed, Apr-23-03, 16:11
In the end, Dr Atkins had to pay up

By Adam Nicolson (Filed: 22/04/2003)
link to article (http://www.opinion.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main.jhtml?xml=/opinion/2003/04/22/do2202.xml&sSheet=/opinion/2003/04/22/ixopinion.html)

I do hope his widow, Veronica, is not reading this - and if she is, may she forgive me - but the death of Dr Robert Atkins, the diet guru and millionaire, does, I have to admit, give me some rather obscure pleasure.

It is not the fact that he is dead, but the manner of his dying. The poor man had recently turned 70. His latest book, Atkins for Life, was recently published in America. Two older titles, Dr Atkins' New Diet Revolution and Dr Atkins' New Diet Cookbook, are both riding sky-high in the bestseller lists across the world. With all this, the super-rich diet doctor slipped on the pavement in Manhattan last week and hit his head.

New York's greatest surgeons operated to save him but he never regained consciousness. A life devoted to the cheating of the stomach was brought to an end by a combination of foot failure and skull failure. He had attended for so long to the middle (he suffered at one stage from a triple chin); but it was the extremities that let him down.

I know one should be pious at these moments. It was a life in service of millions. Brad Pitt, Jennifer Aniston, Geri Halliwell, Julia Roberts and Catherine Zeta Jones would all be very different people today if they hadn't been able to "watch the fat melt away" under the low-carb/hi-protein gospel which Dr Atkins preached. But there is something about his have-it-all-and-don't-worry message which irks the puritan in me.

Just as he specialised in those unwieldy titles which spread like an out-of-control stomach across the whole extent of a paperback cover, his underlying point was that you could enjoy every conceivable benefit, you could pile on the cheese and cream cheese, you could go for fat in the pluperfect, you could eat steak for tea and pâté de foie gras for breakfast, no pat of butter could be too fat and still you could look like a film star.

The Atkins route to happiness has no discernible cost. Paradise is here and now. And it is to that idea the accident on the sidewalk is such a ringing riposte: comeuppance from the legs and head, the parts no Atkins revolution had ever reached.

Only in America could the idea of all-for-nothing sell 25 million copies of a book (it is, in effect, the same book over and over again) and Atkins's death bears a cousin relationship to two other American deaths.

On July 20, 1984, Dr Jim Fixx, author of the 1977 bestseller The Complete Book of Running, a work which effectively invented the modern craze for jogging, went for a jog in Greensboro, Vermont. He was 52. Within a minute or two, he collapsed and died of an enormous heart attack.

His autopsy revealed that of his three coronary arteries, one was 99 per cent clogged, another 80 per cent and the third 70 per cent. If he hadn't gone for a jog and had sat calmly at home reading the paper, Dr Fixx would have been fine. But he must have been eating fat for New England.

More poignant still is the death of the American whom no one has ever heard of but who wreaked more damage upon this planet than any human being, or any single organism, who has ever lived. In the First World War, Thomas Midgely invented what he called the robot bomb, in other words the first guided missile, from which every smart weapon is lineally descended.

In 1921, working for General Motors, he discovered that the addition of lead to petrol made engines run more smoothly. With Midgely as their patron saint, six trillion gallons of leaded petrol were burned over the next half century, poisoning the world's children and destroying the earth's atmosphere.

The great man then turned his genius to GM's Motors Frigidaire division, discovered the efficacy of chlorofluorocarbons as fridge coolants, which over the next 40 years were made and released into the atmosphere at the rate of 750,000 tons a year, destroying still more of the earth's atmosphere.

Midgely won all the prizes, became president of the American Chemical Society, but in middle age contracted polio. He designed an elaborate system of blocks and tackles with which to get in and out of bed. In 1944, when he was 55, he died of strangulation, suspended above his bed tangled up in his own network of ropes and pulleys, killed, as the Dictionary of American Biography puts it, "by a combination of bad luck and his own ingenuity".

Atkins, Fixx, Midgely: it is unfair to label America with these men, but there is something profoundly American about their stories. This country is now more deeply in bed with America than at any time since the heyday of Margaret Thatcher's love affair with Ronald Reagan.

The core of Thatcherism - no compromise, do what your instincts tell you and deal with the consequences later, don't pussyfoot with middle-roadism when you can see your own path clearly ahead - was, in its way, as American as the Atkins, Fixx and Midgely stories are. It, too, became tangled in its own ropes and pulleys, tripping up on the pavement, collapsing when out for its all too usual jog.

This is not a European habit of mind and the American path which Blair has taken over Iraq bears all the marks of Midgely-type thinking: turn to the simple and powerful idea; transform that idea into a powerful force; apply that force with uncompromising vigour; and only then look for collateral damage.

Blair, in trying to get the second UN resolution, attempted to Europeanise this approach, but he failed and we are left unequivocally in the American camp, deeply isolated from the other Europeans, outside the euro, outside the Schengen border-free zone and, above all, outside the Europe-wide consensus on the way to proceed in the Middle East.

It seems a curious destination for the pro-European Mr Blair to have reached. And can it really be the place in the world which this country wants to occupy, its position subsumed not in a putative Euro-superstate but in a perfectly real American one, whose governing mentality is either "You can have it all" or "Hang the consequences"?

tamarian
Wed, Apr-23-03, 16:22
The author, Adam Nicolson, with all due respect, is a bottom dweller.

It's extremely disturbing how much pleasure he's displaying at someone's death, and admits to it.

In fact, he appears to be relishing it so much, that he can't make a point. Really, what is his point, if there is one....

Wa'il

wcollier
Wed, Apr-23-03, 16:26
A life devoted to the cheating of the stomach was brought to an end by a combination of foot failure and skull failure.
Is this guy a sociopath to take pleasure in someone else's demise?

I won't even comment on his moronic description of "cause of death".

gotbeer
Wed, Apr-23-03, 16:58
The British media is often noted for their irreverent, sometimes scathing obituaries. I was actually expecting far, far worse.

tofi
Wed, Apr-23-03, 17:42
I'm really sorry you posted this. Even a link to it would have been preferable if also unecessary.

So many of us, including all the people who followed him with CAD, PPP & other plans, owe him a better remembrance than bringing this garbage to this low carb site.

I would hope you would click on the "Report this post to a Moderator" button and request that it be removed. And I speak as a simple member of this board, not a Moderator.

As your signature says, he saved your life. Do you think posting this expresses the thanks you may owe him?
:cry:

orzabelle
Thu, Apr-24-03, 07:49
I'm glad gotbeer posted this. We can't be allergic to other points of view - even the scathing ones. It's important to see what kind of misinformation is out there - how EVERYONE thinks Atkins means steaks at every meal. Ridiculous! I eat almost exactly the way I did before, except that I've cut out bread, pasta, sugar, rice, etc. How can that be bad for me?

wcollier
Thu, Apr-24-03, 08:46
Since it is a sensitive article for some, maybe we could move this thread to the War Zone where people know to "enter at their own risk"?

orzabelle
Thu, Apr-24-03, 08:48
Good point, Wanda. I was going to edit my post to say that 'that's what war zone is for' when I realized it was not actually in there.

BugMan
Thu, Apr-24-03, 09:00
I think it is funny just how missinformed a person can be. That this dribble was ever published as news is amazing. How someone can take 3 people who have changed lives in a positive way and make fun of them once they can no longer defend themselves is the sign of a true coward.

orzabelle
Thu, Apr-24-03, 09:06
Yeah, since he's probably done this sort of thing lots of times, there will probably be plenty of contenders to write this guy's eulogy when the time comes... Lots of people will be out for posthumous revenge.

gotbeer
Thu, Apr-24-03, 09:19
To answer those who question why I posted this:

1. I was NOT happy about this article, but ignoring such garbage doesn't necessarily make it go away. Some cancers have to be cut out.

2. Some members of this board have directly engaged authors and publications of Atkins misinformation to good effect. If they are not alerted to such tripe, how will they know where to counter it? If the article angers you, do something about it beyond closing your eyes.

3. This is the Media Watch - not the Good Media Watch. An otherwise respected British publication posted that.

4. We are mostly grownups here, and grownups know that the world can be a contentious, idiotic place. Moral folk try to make the world a better place by countering the contentious and the idiotic, in my experience.

5. Dr. Atkins himself was known to be an irascible fellow in his private (and sometimes his public) life, but does that make ignoring HIS message worthwhile? For me, that would be literal suicide.

30 years of ridicule for being right would make me irascible, too!

Talon
Thu, Apr-24-03, 10:17
While I wish this article was never published, and I cannot believe the audacity of one human being to write something of this manner - it is press about the low-carb lifestyle. No matter how wrong, misinformed or just plain ignorant it is.

Dr. Atkins does deserve our respect. We need to defend him against silly media fodder. So knowing about it helps us keep more informed and ready to defend this (as we know it is) HEALTHY way of eating.

Lisa N
Thu, Apr-24-03, 15:38
You know...as I read this again, it seems just a much a rant against what the author perceives as American ideals and Britain's alliance with America in the Iraq war as it is a public roasting of Dr. Atkins posthumously. A public tantrum, if you will.
While it may have made it into the media, I see it as far from good journalism; it's petty, mean and in just plain poor taste. Not to mention that his facts about low carb and Dr. Atkins personally are inaccurate.
Frankly, I hope he catches hell from the public for it.

BugMan
Thu, Apr-24-03, 21:56
[/quote]The Atkins route to happiness has no discernible cost. Paradise is here and now. And it is to that idea the accident on the sidewalk is such a ringing riposte: comeuppance from the legs and head, the parts no Atkins revolution had ever reached.[quote]

In the article he makes it sound as if there is no discernable cost. I guess he doesn't understand just how much food is avoided to follow the Atkins program. I can't say I really have suffered by eliminating sugar, bread, cookies, donuts, pizza, lasagna, spagetti, banana bread, ice cream, etc... but there has been a cost.

Second, Dr Jim Fixx wasn't having to pay up for starting the running craze in America, he was unlucky. The science of the heart wasn't as advanced then as it is today. Maybe he would have died ten years earlier if he hadn't been running. Maybe if he had started running ten years earlier than he had, he would have had no heart condition. Maybe if he had met Dr. Atkins he would still be alive, avoiding carbs that contributed to the builup in his arteries.

Lastly, Thomas Midgley may have contributed to some deaths as a result of his work on bombs, but how many american soldiers lives were saved as a result of his work? His work on cubustion engines may be responsible for many other lives saved by making it possible for people to get quickly to needed medical care when time was critical. To this day it is still disputed whether or no the Ozone hole is a naturally occuring phenomonom, or the result of chlorofluorocarbons. It is certain that countless people are alive today as a result of refriderated foods. There is no evidence that anyone has died as a result of chlorofluorocarbons being released into the atmosphere. I could go on but I won't.

If Adam Nicholson want's to have a legacy that extends beyond his poultry diatribe, maybe he should go back to school. Maybe he could become a Doctor or a Chemist and try to influence a positive change in the lives of millions like the the men he so unwisely disparagged. Instead of complaining about the perceived wrongs these men have done, do something useful and figure out how to improve the world you live in.

GaryW
Fri, Apr-25-03, 01:01
As one who has spent the time beyond self-fuming over moronic, misinformed journalists to email them corrective comments... and as much as the article offended me more than any anti-low-carb / whatever his deranged head trip was about, I have to say it is important that there is *some* sort of place on this and other low carb boards to alert those of us willing to take our principles to pen (or keyboard) and fight the good fight beyond watching our daily carb gram counts (smile).

I can't easily post the link, as it's a javascript pop-up. But the following reader letter to the editor was published by the Daily Telegraph (where that abomnible author's article originally appeared).

I didn't write this, but I salute the low-carb defender who did. Thank you, Mr. Walker.

Found under their "feedback for 22-25 April"

Story hyperlink title:
In defence of Dr Atkins
Millions of people have benefited from the Atkins diet

(contents)

Re: In defence of Dr Atkins
From: Robert Walker
Date: 23 April 2003


SIR - I feel the need to comment on the biased and unnecessarily offensive commentary by Adam Nicolson [In the end, Dr Atkins had to pay up, 22 April 2003].

First of all, to express pleasure over the needless and accidental death of anyone is insensitive. Mr Nicolson obviously has an issue (with America) and has chosen a defenceless target - the recently deceased Dr Atkins.

However, he forgets that there are millions of people who have benefited from the Atkins diet. The Atkins lifestyle is not the "have-it-all-and-don't-worry" plan that Nicolson thinks it is.

To compare Dr Atkins, someone who spent his life trying to improve the health of millions, all the while enduring the scorn of his contemporaries, as well as the the AMA and FDA, with someone who (albeit unwittingly) developed products that harmed the environment, is outrageous.

It further highlights the negative bias that influenced this article. Did Mr Nicolson get paid for this article? If so, then what right does he have to complain about Atkins' book sales?

Lastly, there is one other little fact that Mr Nicolson overlooked. Everyone dies. No matter how it happens, no matter where it happens; it happens to everyone. The fact that Dr Atkins died from a head injury is regrettable and millions are mourning his passing.

(end)

fairchild
Fri, Apr-25-03, 06:13
First off, I am not offended by this article.
The USA has some of the strongest free speech in the world, much stronger than the UK. I think that it attempts to mesh a number of strange UK political statements out of the ironic circumstances of the tragic death of Dr. Atkins.
Dr. Atkins had a profound effect on directly changing peoples lives for the better. That statement says it all. Yes, he profited from that, but anyone who has followed his work can not dispute that he was driven by empathy not greed.
The irony that his diet had nothing to do with his cause of death is not lost on me, but one must see thorugh the details and see his quality of life as improved by this diet. He lived well and loved his work, that too is admirable.
When I was young, my father made all of us kids spend three years in a martial arts program. The first year we spent just falling down ! Sounds stupid but they stressed to us the importance of learning how to land when falling off balance. You learn that it is better to shatter your elbow or even break your back than to land on your head. When the Dr. fell I remember telling my Dad, who is also an Atkins devotee, that I really appreciated that training.
The only lesson I see out of his death is that we should all learn how to fall properly, especially if you are older. The lesson I see from his life is that it is possible to love your work profit from it and help people change their lives so that they not only are healthier but happier.
If this writer had read any of the books that Dr. Atkins wrote, or had an appreciation of the latest obesity report [33% of Americans] or the latest research from the American Cancer Society which linked being overwieght with a 20% greater likelihood of cancer, then the writer might think twice of using this tragedy as a chance to editorialize Blair.
It simply discredits the writer.

gotbeer
Fri, Apr-25-03, 11:10
Thanks for posting that, GaryW. Letters like that are precisely what I was trying to encourage by starting this thread.

Isa
Fri, Apr-25-03, 11:34
The author of that deeply silly article just might meet his own demise when he falls off his high horse.

Isa